ArticleThe oncologist2018
Enhancing Next-Generation Sequencing-Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing.
Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for genomic science: a scoping review of concepts, architectures, applications, and open challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Loss of Ribosomal Protein L22 (RPL22) Expression Identifies a Transcriptional Subset of MLH1-Deficient Endometrial Cancers With Lower Numbers of Tumor-Associated Lymphocytes.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2026Article
- Differential Localization of β-Catenin Protein in CTNNB1 Mutant Endometrial Cancers Results in Distinct Transcriptional Profiles.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025Article
- VOYAGER: an international consortium investigating the role of human papilloma virus and genetics in oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk and survival.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Tribulations and future opportunities for artificial intelligence in precision medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Personalized anesthesia and precision medicine: a comprehensive review of genetic factors, artificial intelligence, and patient-specific factors.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical reporting for personalized cancer genomics requires extensive access to subscription-only literature.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2023Article
- The development of a machine learning algorithm for early detection of viral hepatitis B infection in Nigerian patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research: Trends, Challenges and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Targeted next generation sequencing ofHeliyon · 2022Article
- Introducing AI to the molecular tumor board: one direction toward the establishment of precision medicine using large-scale cancer clinical and biological information.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- The Perception of Health Professionals in Bangladesh toward the Digitalization of the Health Sector.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Serial Analysis of Clinical Cancer Genomics Data Identifies Changing Treatment Recommendations and Therapeutic Targets.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Article
- Molecular-based precision oncology clinical decision making augmented by artificial intelligence.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence: Review of Current and Future Applications in Medicine.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence for assisting cancer diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Review
- Healthcare Digitalisation and the Changing Nature of Work and Society.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Editorial: Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Medicine and the 2020 CONSORT-AI Study Guidelines.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.Cancer medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsing next-generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires considerable manual curation performed mainly by human "molecular tumor boards" (MTBs). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of cognitive computing as performed by Watson for Genomics (WfG) compared with a human MTB. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne thousand eighteen patient cases that previously underwent targeted exon sequencing at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and subsequent analysis by the UNCseq informatics pipeline and the UNC MTB between November 7, 2011, and May 12, 2015, were analyzed with WfG, a cognitive computing technology for genomic analysis.
resultsUsing a WfG-curated actionable gene list, we identified additional genomic events of potential significance (not discovered by traditional MTB curation) in 323 (32%) patients. The majority of these additional genomic events were considered actionable based upon their ability to qualify patients for biomarker-selected clinical trials. Indeed, the opening of a relevant clinical trial within 1 month prior to WfG analysis provided the rationale for identification of a new actionable event in nearly a quarter of the 323 patients. This automated analysis took <3 minutes per case.
conclusionThese results demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic NGS results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing could potentially improve patient care by providing a rapid, comprehensive approach for data analysis and consideration of up-to-date availability of clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic next-generation sequencing results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing can significantly improve patient care by providing a fast, cost-effective, and comprehensive approach for data analysis in the delivery of precision medicine. Patients and physicians who are considering enrollment in clinical trials may benefit from the support of such tools applied to genomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.