ArticleThe oncologist2017
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Antitumor Activity of Necuparanib Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Phase I Results.
Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with necuparanib or placebo in untreated metastatic pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2020Trial
- Non-anticoagulant heparins: glycan-mediated immune modulation and therapeutic applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From Native Glycosaminoglycans to Mimetics: Design, Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Multifaceted Heparin: Diverse Applications beyond Anticoagulant Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Heparanase 2 (Hpa2)- a new player essential for pancreatic acinar cell differentiation.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- Review
- Pancreatic Cancer: Recent Progress of Drugs in Clinical Trials.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
- New classes of potent heparanase inhibitors from ligand-based virtual screening.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
- Non-anticoagulant Heparin as a Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Prevents Lyme Disease Infection.ACS infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Non-Anticoagulant Heparins as Heparanase Inhibitors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- MiR-760 enhances sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine through modulating Integrin β1.Bioscience reports · 2019Article
- Targeting Heparanase in Cancer: Inhibition by Synthetic, Chemically Modified, and Natural Compounds.iScience · 2019Review
- Clinical Trials Targeting the Stroma in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2019Review
- Long non-coding RNA LINC00346 promotes pancreatic cancer growth and gemcitabine resistance by sponging miR-188-3p to derepress BRD4 expression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Article
- Cancer Metastasis: The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and the Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Perlecan.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Heparan Sulfate Mimetics in Cancer Therapy: The Challenge to Define Structural Determinants and the Relevance of Targets for Optimal Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- How does the tumor microenvironment play a role in hepatobiliary tumors?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Review
- Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Cancer: A Long Slog.The oncologist · 2017Article
- Response to Drs Von Hoff and Renschler.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2017Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
lessons learnedDespite the compelling preclinical rationale of evaluating the genetically engineered heparin derivative, necuparanib, combined with standard therapy in metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma, the results were ultimately disappointing.Safety was documented, although dose escalation was limited by the number of subcutaneous injections, the potential for skin toxicity (cellulitis), and low-level anticoagulant effect. Nonetheless, the hypothesis of targeting prothrombotic pathways in pancreas adenocarcinoma remains compelling.
backgroundNecuparanib is derived from unfractionated heparin and engineered for reduced anticoagulant activity while preserving known heparin-associated antitumor properties. This trial assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and initial efficacy of necuparanib combined with gemcitabine ± nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
methodsPatients received escalating daily subcutaneous doses of necuparanib plus 1,000 mg/m
resultsThirty-nine patients were enrolled into seven cohorts (necuparanib 0.5, 1 mg/kg + gemcitabine; necuparanib 1, 2, 4, 6, and 5 mg/kg + nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine). The most common adverse events were anemia (56%), fatigue (51%), neutropenia (51%), leukopenia (41%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). No deaths and two serious adverse events were potentially related to necuparanib. Measurable levels of necuparanib were seen starting at the 2 mg/kg dose. Of 24 patients who received at least one dose of necuparanib + nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 9 (38%) achieved a partial response and 6 (25%) achieved stable disease (63% disease control rate). Given a cellulitis event and mild activated partial thromboplastin time increases at 6 mg/kg, the 5 mg/kg dose was considered the MTD and selected for further assessment in phase II.
conclusionAcceptable safety and encouraging signals of activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving necuparanib, nab-paclitaxel, and gemcitabine were demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.