ReviewThe oncologist2018
Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors or Secondary Brain Metastasis.
Review in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Synergistic effects of anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical evidence.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Acute Neurological Complications of Brain Tumors and Immune Therapies, a Guideline for the Neuro-hospitalist.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020Guideline
- Evidence gap in predicting intracranial haemorrhage risk in people with glioma on anticoagulants: a scoping review.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- DLGAP5 facilitates glioblastoma growth and tumor-associated macrophage M2 polarization.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- STARTing to bridge the evidence gap: management of cancer-associated thrombosis with concomitant thrombocytopenia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy-the not-so-insignificant contributor to cancer-associated venous thrombosis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinical Challenges in Treating Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Clinically Oriented Review.Acta haematologica · 2025Review
- Predictors and surgical outcome of hemorrhagic metastatic brain malignancies.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Exploratory rivaroxaban trial for isolated calf deep vein thrombosis with a risk factor of thrombosis extension: an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Management of Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Neuro-oncologic Emergencies.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Venous Thrombotic Events and Anticoagulation in Brain Tumor Patients.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants vs. low-molecular-weight heparin for pulmonary embolism in patients with glioblastoma.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- Article
- A review of anticoagulation in patients with central nervous system malignancy: between a rock and a hard place.Journal of neurology · 2021Review
- Prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases and atrial fibrillation: an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Investigation of the protective effect of heparin pre-treatment on cerebral ischaemia in gerbils.Pharmaceutical biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors are at increased risk of developing venous thromboses. However, the potential benefit of therapeutic anticoagulation in these patients must be weighed against the deadly complication of intracranial hemorrhage. In this review, we summarize available evidence and recent studies of intracranial bleeding risks in primary and metastatic tumors and the impact of therapeutic anticoagulation. We find that for the majority of primary and treated metastatic brain tumors, the risk of spontaneous bleeding is acceptable and not further increased by careful therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, although thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50,000/μL) and other coagulopathies are relative contraindications. Patients with brain metastasis from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma have a higher tendency to bleed spontaneously than noted in patients with other malignancies, and thus warrant routine brain imaging and alternative strategies such as inferior vena cava filter placement in the acute setting of venous thromboembolism before consideration of therapeutic anticoagulation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Malignant gliomas are associated with increased risks of both venous thromboses and intracranial hemorrhage, but the additional bleeding risk associated with therapeutic anticoagulation appears acceptable, especially after treatment of primary tumors. Most patients with treated brain metastasis have a low risk of intracranial hemorrhage associated with therapeutic anticoagulation, and low molecular weight heparin is currently the preferred agent of choice. Patients with untreated brain metastasis from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, thyroid cancer, choriocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma have a higher propensity for spontaneous intracranial bleeding, and systemic anticoagulation may be contraindicated in the acute setting of venous thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.