Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158365›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2018

Phase II Trial Using a Combination of Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Celecoxib with Concurrent Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Resectable Rectal Cancer.

Emilio P Araujo-Mino, Yehuda Z Patt, Cristina Murray-Krezan, Joshua A Hanson, Pranshu Bansal, Ben J Liem, Ashwani Rajput, M Houman Fekrazad, Glenory Heywood, Fa Chyi Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00250835 (A Phase II Trial Using a Combination of Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Celecoxib With Concurrent Radiation for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Resectable Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00250835 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase II Trial Using a Combination of Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Celecoxib With Concurrent Radiation for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Resectable Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew Mexico Cancer Research AllianceRan2005 to 2015Enrolled38ConditionsRectal CancerArmsChemotherapy, Celecoxib, and Radiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emilio P Araujo-MinoKymera Independent Physicians, Roswell, New Mexico, USA pranshu.doc@gmail.com emilio.ecu@gmail.com.
Yehuda Z PattUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Cristina Murray-KrezanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Joshua A HansonUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Pranshu BansalUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA pranshu.doc@gmail.com emilio.ecu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-3070
Ben J LiemUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Ashwani RajputUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
M Houman FekrazadCity of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Glenory HeywoodUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Fa Chyi LeeSanta Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA.
University of New Mexico · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USSanta Clara Valley Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedColorectal cancers exhibit a high level of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression with strong preclinical rationale for improved clinical outcomes with COX-2 inhibition. Celecoxib is a COX-2 inhibitor and we have shown that it can be safely combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as part of neoadjuvant treatment with radiation therapy (RT) in rectal cancer.There was a significant improvement in skin toxicity with this combination as compared with historical data. Considering the field has moved on to single-agent capecitabine, we believe future trials with capecitabine and celecoxib hold potential.

backgroundImproved survival is seen among patients with rectal cancer who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. Cyclooxygenase-

methodsPatients with resectable (T3-4, N1-2) rectal cancer within 12 cm of the anal verge were included in this phase II clinical trial. The neoadjuvant treatment consisted of capecitabine 850 mg/m

resultsThirty-two patients were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was pCR: 31% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%-50%). Secondary endpoints were surgical downstaging (SD): 75% (95% CI: 57%-89%) and sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS): 56% (95% CI: 38%-74%). Common grade >3 toxicities were diarrhea and abnormal liver function tests (9% each). Grade 0 and 1 toxicities included radiation dermatitis (59% and 34%, respectively) and proctitis (63% and 28%, respectively). At 3 years, disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 84% (95% CI: 65%-93%) and 94% (95% CI: 77%-98%), respectively.

conclusionChemoradiation with celecoxib in rectal cancer was well tolerated and demonstrated high rates of pCR, SD, and SSS. Improvement in skin toxicity (34% grade 1 and no grade 3/4) as compared with historical results (43%-78% grade 3/4) seems to be a significant improvement with addition of celecoxib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCelecoxibChemoradiotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxaliplatinPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsSurvival RateCapecitabineCelecoxibOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID29158365
PMCPMC5759821
OpenAlexW2770688714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.