Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158326›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Women and substance use: a qualitative study on sexual and reproductive health of women who use drugs in Delhi, India.

Vartika Sharma, Avina Sarna, Waimar Tun, Lopamudra Ray Saraswati, Ibou Thior, Ira Madan, Stanley Luchters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reconstructing Cross-Cultural Meanings of Addiction Among Women from Three Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Helping Women Suffering from Drug Addiction: Needs, Barriers, and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Vartika SharmaInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Belgium (former Population Council), Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Avina SarnaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Waimar TunPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Lopamudra Ray SaraswatiPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Ibou ThiorPATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Ira MadanSahara Centre for Residential Care and Rehabilitation, New Delhi, India.
Stanley LuchtersInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Belgium (former Population Council), Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
Population Council Institute · INBurnet Institute · AUGhent University · BEPopulation Council · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USSahara Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore contextual factors that increase vulnerabilities to negative sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes and possible differences in SRH-related behaviours and the needs of women who use drugs (WUD) through non-injecting and injecting routes.

designQualitative study design using semi-structured in-depth interviews.

participantsTwenty women who injected drugs in the past 3 months and 28 women who reported using drugs through non-injecting routes in the past 1 month.

settingInterviews were conducted at community-based, drop-in centres in Delhi, India.

resultsStudy findings illustrate that WUD were sexually active and had multiple sex partners including clients of sex work. Transient relationships were reported and many participants engaged in unsafe sex. Factors which affected safe sex behaviours included: gender power imbalance, limited agency for decision-making, lack of accurate information for correct self-risk assessment, and being under the influence of drugs. Despite high awareness, low and inconsistent contraceptive use was reported. Some participants were coerced to conceive while a few others reported their inability to conceive. Violence was a key determinant for SRH outcomes. Perception of certain adverse health outcomes (such as infertility) to be 'common and expected among WUD' influenced access to healthcare. Further, healthcare providers' stigmatising attitudes and lack of women-centric services deterred women from uptake of healthcare services.

conclusionFindings highlight that SRH-related behaviours and needs of this group are a complex interplay of multiple determinants which need to be addressed at all levels: individual, family, community and institutional. It is imperative to roll out a 'one-stop-shop' for a comprehensive package of health services. Expansion of existing drop-in-centres could be considered for setting-up community-based women-centric services with appropriate linkage to drug dependence treatment and reproductive health services.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesSexual BehaviorSexual HealthSubstance-Related DisordersWomenAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingDrug UsersFemaleGender IdentityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiapublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29158326
PMCPMC5701983
OpenAlexW2768404495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.