Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29157320›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Comparison of high and low trans-fatty acid consumers: analyses of UK National Diet and Nutrition Surveys before and after product reformulation.

Jayne Hutchinson, Holly L Rippin, Jo Jewell, Joao J Breda, Janet E Cade

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Dietary Intake ofNutrients · 2021
    Trial
  3. The effectiveness of mandatoryThe British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jayne Hutchinson1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6251-5013
Holly L Rippin1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.
Jo Jewell2Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-Course,WHO Regional Office for Europe,Copenhagen,Denmark.
Joao J Breda2Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promoting Health through the Life-Course,WHO Regional Office for Europe,Copenhagen,Denmark.
Janet E Cade1Nutritional Epidemiology Group (NEG),School of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Leeds,Leeds LS2 9JT,UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-0121

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe WHO encourages the virtual elimination of artificial trans-fatty acids (TFA), which increase CHD risk. Our UK analysis explores whether voluntary reformulation results in differential TFA intakes among socio-economic groups by determining characteristics of high TFA consumers before and after product reformulation.

designFood intake was collected by 7d weighed records pre-reformulation and 4d diaries post-reformulation. Sociodemographic characteristics of TFA consumers above the WHO limit, and of the top 10 % of TFA consumers as a percentage food energy, were compared with those of lower TFA consumers. Multivariate logistic regression determined independent socio-economic predictors of being a top 10 % consumer. SUBJECTS: UK National Diet and Nutrition Surveys (NDNS) for adults aged 19-64 years pre-reformulation (2000/01; N 1724) and post-reformulation (2010/11-2011/12; N 848).

resultsPost-reformulation 2·5 % of adults exceeded the WHO limit, v. 57 % pre-reformulation. In unadjusted analyses, high TFA consumption was associated with lower income, lower education and long-term illness/disability pre- but not post-reformulation. In adjusted pre-reformulation analyses, degree holders were half as likely as those without qualifications to be top 10 % consumers (OR=0·51; 95 % CI 0·28, 0·92). In adjusted post-reformulation analyses, those with higher income were 2·5-3·3 times more likely to be top 10 % consumers than lowest income households. Pre-reformulation, high consumers consumed more foods containing artificial TFA, whereas ruminant TFA were more prominent post-reformulation.

conclusionsHigh TFA consumption was associated with socio-economic disadvantage pre-reformulation, but evidence of this is less clear post-reformulation. Voluntary reformulation appeared effective in reducing TFA content in many UK products with mixed effects on dietary inequalities relating to income and education.

Indexed as

DietDietary FatsFeeding BehaviorFood HandlingSocial ClassTrans Fatty AcidsAdultDiet SurveysEducational StatusFemaleFood IndustryHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysDietary FatsTrans Fatty AcidsArtificial TFA reductionConsumer characteristicsIndustry product reformulationSocio-economic disadvantageTrans-fatty acids (TFA)WHO TFA recommendations

Identifiers

PMID29157320
PMCPMC10260737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.