Observational studyBMC health services research2017
Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived facilitators and barriers to routine utilisation of standardised outcome measures among physiotherapists in Namibia.Ghana medical journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating an online stroke training programme for Saudi Arabian physiotherapists for improving their knowledge and confidence in long-term stroke care: a pilot mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Utilisation of standardised outcomes measures by clinical Physiotherapists working in Namibia: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2024Article
- Current use of patient-reported outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of Using Standardized Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study of Practice Among Neurophysiotherapists.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Use of standardised outcome measures among physiotherapists in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2024Article
- Arabic Translation and Psychometric Validation of PROMIS General Life Satisfaction Short Form in the General Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Survey on the Use of Outcome Measures during Physical Therapy Interventions by Physical Therapists in Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool at Discharge Predicts Community Outdoor Walking Capacity in Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Physical therapy · 2023Article
- Arabic Patient-Reported Measures of Activity and Participation for Children: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Standardized tools for assessing balance and mobility in stroke clinical practice guidelines worldwide: A scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Perceived Application and Barriers for Gait Assessment in Physical Therapy Practice in Saudi Arabia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with post COVID-19 condition: current use of measuring instruments by physiotherapists working in Austria and South Tyrol.Archives of physiotherapy · 2022Article
- Test-retest reliability for performance-based outcome measures among individuals with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- The Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used with Low Back Pain and the Attitude of Primary Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia toward Them.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review.Archives of physiotherapy · 2021Review
- Physical Therapists' Assessment of Patient Self-Efficacy for Home Exercise Programs.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2021Article
- Assessing the Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for Stroke Rehabilitation among Physiotherapists in Ghana.Stroke research and treatment · 2020Article
- Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey.BMC health services research · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of standardized outcome measures (SOMs) has been recommended in the physical therapy practice guidelines to improve the patient's management and encourage the evidence based practice. However, the extent of the use of SOMs by physical therapists (PTs) in Saudi Arabia was not investigated. The present study aimed to (1) evaluate the extent of the use of SOMs by PTs in routine daily practice in Saudi Arabia; (2) explore the barriers, facilitators and perceptions in the use of SOMs during physical therapy services; (3) examine the relationship between facility settings and the PTs characteristics and the use of SOMs.
methodsThe present study used an observational design. A survey based questionnaire used and distributed to 352 PTs who were working in Saudi Arabia and was commonly involved in the management of patients within different clinical settings, either private or public.
resultsOne-hundred-eighty participants completed the questionnaires (response rate of 51%). One-hundred-eleven (62%) participants indicated that they used SOMs in their practice. The most common barriers to using the SOMs were time-consuming for patients and therapist and difficult to understand the outcome measures by the patients. Those with a Masters degree were 3.5 times more likely to use SOMs compared to PTs with diploma level qualification [Odd Ratio (95% CI) 3.5 (0.9-12.6)]. Participants with a clinical specialty were nearly 3 times more likely to use SOMs than those who do not have a specialty [Odd Ratio (95% CI) 2.9 (1.6-5.5)].
conclusionsNearly two-thirds of the participants indicated that they used SOMs in clinical practice. Time-consuming for patient and therapist, difficult to understand the SOMs by the patients were the main perceived barriers. Years of experience, professional degree, and clinical specialty had a high probability of using SOMs. The majority of the participants showed the willingness to use SOMs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.