ArticleBMC systems biology2017
Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell data: a mechanistic approach.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian inference of gene regulatory networks at stochastic steady state.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Gillespie-based simulation and inference for non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Cell trajectory inference based on schrödinger problem and a mechanistic model of stochastic gene expression.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Unifying non-Markovian dynamics and agent heterogeneity in scalable stochastic networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multiscale modeling of the spatial structure of stem cells in neuroblastoma patient-derived tumoroids reveals a critical role for a short-range diffusive process.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Navigating the landscape of direct cellular reprogramming with DiReG.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks at Stochastic Steady State.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Gene regulatory network inference with popInfer reveals the dynamic regulation of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence.iScience · 2025Article
- Learning stochastic processes with intrinsic noise from cross-sectional biological data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Uncovering candidate Nanog-Helper genes in early mouse embryo differentiation using differential entropy and network inference.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficient construction of Markov state models for stochastic gene regulatory networks by domain decomposition.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Efficient approximations of transcriptional bursting effects on the dynamics of a gene regulatory network.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Determining interaction directionality in complex biochemical networks from stationary measurements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Marker genes reveal dynamic features of cell evolving processes.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Modeling relaxation experiments with a mechanistic model of gene expression.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- TopoDoE: a design of experiment strategy for selection and refinement in ensembles of executable gene regulatory networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Inferring Stochastic Rates from Heterogeneous Snapshots of Particle Positions.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Stochastic modeling of a gene regulatory network driving B cell development in germinal centers.PloS one · 2024Article
- Transcriptional bursting dynamics in gene expression.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe recent development of single-cell transcriptomics has enabled gene expression to be measured in individual cells instead of being population-averaged. Despite this considerable precision improvement, inferring regulatory networks remains challenging because stochasticity now proves to play a fundamental role in gene expression. In particular, mRNA synthesis is now acknowledged to occur in a highly bursty manner.
resultsWe propose to view the inference problem as a fitting procedure for a mechanistic gene network model that is inherently stochastic and takes not only protein, but also mRNA levels into account. We first explain how to build and simulate this network model based upon the coupling of genes that are described as piecewise-deterministic Markov processes. Our model is modular and can be used to implement various biochemical hypotheses including causal interactions between genes. However, a naive fitting procedure would be intractable. By performing a relevant approximation of the stationary distribution, we derive a tractable procedure that corresponds to a statistical hidden Markov model with interpretable parameters. This approximation turns out to be extremely close to the theoretical distribution in the case of a simple toggle-switch, and we show that it can indeed fit real single-cell data. As a first step toward inference, our approach was applied to a number of simple two-gene networks simulated in silico from the mechanistic model and satisfactorily recovered the original networks.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that functional interactions between genes can be inferred from the distribution of a mechanistic, dynamical stochastic model that is able to describe gene expression in individual cells. This approach seems promising in relation to the current explosion of single-cell expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.