Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29157243›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Factors influencing the use of malaria prevention strategies by women in Senegal: a cross-sectional study.

Mouhamed Abdou Salam Mbengue, Amy K Bei, Aminata Mboup, Ambroise Ahouidi, Moussa Sarr, Souleymane Mboup, Oumar Gaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mouhamed Abdou Salam MbengueInstitut de Recherche en Santé, de Surveillance Epidémiologique et de Formations (IRESSEF), Arrondissement 4, Rue 2D1, Pôle Urbain de Diamniadio, BP 7325, Dakar, Senegal. abdousalam.mbengue@iressef.org.
Amy K BeiDepartment of Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Aminata MboupDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Ambroise AhouidiInstitut de Recherche en Santé, de Surveillance Epidémiologique et de Formations (IRESSEF), Arrondissement 4, Rue 2D1, Pôle Urbain de Diamniadio, BP 7325, Dakar, Senegal.
Moussa SarrWestat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Souleymane MboupInstitut de Recherche en Santé, de Surveillance Epidémiologique et de Formations (IRESSEF), Arrondissement 4, Rue 2D1, Pôle Urbain de Diamniadio, BP 7325, Dakar, Senegal.
Oumar GayeWest Africa Global Health Alliance (WAGHA), Dakar, Senegal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) as a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of malaria during pregnancy in endemic areas. This study was conducted to investigate: (1) the extent of use of both IPTp and ITNs, and (2) conduct multinomial regression to identify factors affecting the optimal usage of IPTp and ITNs among women with a recent pregnancy in Senegal.

methodsData was drawn from the 2013-2014 Demographic and Health Survey. A total of 4616 women aged 15-49 years old, who had a recent pregnancy were analyzed. Multinomial logistic regression model was used to assess factors associated with optimal uptake of malaria preventive strategies (both IPTp and ITN use).

resultsAmongst women who had a recent pregnancy, less than half of them used ITNs (46.84%) however, 80.35% reported taking IPTp during their last pregnancy. Overall, 37.51% reported using the optimal malaria preventive strategies. Women aged 35-49 years and living in the richer or middle wealth quintile were more likely to use optimal prevention methods. Pregnant women living in Diourbel, Saint-Louis, Thies, Louga, Fatick and Matam were more likely to use both IPTp-SP and ITNs compared to those living in Dakar. Additionally, women who initiated antenatal care in at least at 6 weeks of pregnancy or who attended four antenatal visits or more were more likely to use optimal malaria preventive methods during pregnancy.

conclusionsThis study has shown important factors that influence the uptake of malaria prevention methods during pregnancy in Senegal. These findings highlight the need for targeted preventive strategies when designing and implementing policies aimed at improving the uptake of these measures during pregnancy in Senegal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMiddle AgedPrenatal CareSenegalYoung AdultInsecticide-treated nets (ITNs)Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp)MalariaPregnancyPreventionSenegal

Identifiers

PMID29157243
PMCPMC5697112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.