Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29157232›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2017

Implementation of an interprofessional team-based learning program involving seven undergraduate health and social care programs from two universities, and students' evaluation of their readiness for interprofessional learning.

Lap Ki Chan, Fraide Ganotice, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Chak Sing Lau, Susan M Bridges, Celia Hoi Yan Chan, Namkiu Chan, Phoebe Wing Lam Chan, Hai Yong Chen, Julie Yun Chen and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interprofessional Team-based Learning: Building Social Capital.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Lap Ki ChanThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. lapki@hku.hk.
Fraide GanoticeThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Frances Kam Yuet WongThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Chak Sing LauThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Susan M BridgesThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Celia Hoi Yan ChanThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Namkiu ChanThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Phoebe Wing Lam ChanThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Hai Yong ChenThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Julie Yun ChenThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Jody Kwok Pui ChuThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Charlene C HoThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Jacqueline Mei Chi HoThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Tai Pong LamThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Veronica Suk Fun LamThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Qingyun LiThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Jian Gang ShenThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Julian Alexander TannerThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Winnie Wan Yee TsoThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Arkers Kwan Ching WongThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Gordon Tin Chun WongThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Janet Yuen Ha WongThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Nai Sum WongThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Alan WorsleyThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Lei King YuThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Tin Pui YumThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional learning is gaining momentum in revolutionizing healthcare education. During the academic year 2015/16, seven undergraduate-entry health and social care programs from two universities in Hong Kong took part in an interprofessional education program. Based on considerations such as the large number of students involved and the need to incorporate adult learning principles, team-based learning was adopted as the pedagogy for the program, which was therefore called the interprofessional team-based learning program (IPTBL). The authors describe the development and implementation of the IPTBL program and evaluate the effectiveness of the program implementation.

methodsEight hundred and one students, who are predominantly Chinese, participated in the IPTBL. The quantitative design (a pretest-posttest experimental design) was utilized to examine the students' gains on their readiness to engage in interprofessional education (IPE).

resultsThree instructional units (IUs) were implemented, each around a clinical area which could engage students from complementary health and social care disciplines. Each IU followed a team-based learning (TBL) process: pre-class study, individual readiness assurance test, team readiness assurance test, appeal, feedback, and application exercise. An electronic platform was developed and was progressively introduced in the three IUs. The students' self-perceived attainment of the IPE learning outcomes was high. Across all four subscales of RIPLS, there was significant improvement in student's readiness to engage in interprofessional learning after the IPTBL. A number of challenges were identified: significant time involvement of the teachers, difficulty in matching students from different programs, difficulty in making IPTBL count towards a summative assessment score, difficulty in developing the LAMS platform, logistics difficulty in managing paper TBL, and inappropriateness of the venue.

conclusionsDespite some challenges in developing and implementing the IPTBL program, our experience showed that TBL is a viable pedagogy to be used in interprofessional education involving hundreds of students. The significant improvement in all four subscales of RIPLS showed the effects of the IPTBL program in preparing students for collaborative practice. Factors that contributed to the success of the use of TBL for IPE are discussed.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsStudents, Health OccupationsBiological Science DisciplinesCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth OccupationsHong KongHumansMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalSocial WorkUniversitiesYoung AdultAdult learning principlesCollaborative practiceEvaluationInterprofessional education

Identifiers

PMID29157232
PMCPMC5697117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.