ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017
Alkaline peptone water enrichment with a dipstick test to quickly detect and monitor cholera outbreaks.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07685574 (Case-area Targeted Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Case-area Targeted Interventions (CATIs) Among Household Contacts and Neighbouring Households After Defining Cholera Hotspot Areas in Bangladesh: The Effectiveness of OCV and Potential Impact on Cholera Control
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Estimating the proportion of clinically suspected cholera cases that are true Vibrio cholerae infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Cholera diagnosis in human stool and detection in water: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Simple and Rapid Diagnostic Test RLDT for the Detection of Cholera in Bangladesh.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Uganda's cholera elimination journey in a cholera endemic region of Africa.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Utilizing rapid diagnostic tests in infectious disease surveillance and response in humanitarian emergencies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Enhancing national cholera surveillance using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): A mixed methods evaluation.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Core and accessory genomic traits of Vibrio cholerae O1 drive lineage transmission and disease severity.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Cholera rages in Africa and the Middle East: A narrative review on challenges and solutions.Health science reports · 2024Review
- National Hospital-Based Sentinel Surveillance for Cholera in Bangladesh: Epidemiological Results from 2014 to 2021.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Contrasting Epidemiology of Cholera in Bangladesh and Africa.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Review
- Cholera Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Laboratory evaluation of the rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 using diarrheal samples.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Field Evaluation of Cholkit Rapid Diagnostic Test forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetection, confirmation and monitoring of cholera outbreaks in many developing countries including Uganda is a big challenge due to lack of the required resources and the time the test takes. Culture method which takes 24-48 h to get the feedback and requires highly skilled laboratory staff plus other complex resources is the standard test. This study evaluated the new cholera rapid detection method that relies on Crystal VC dipsticks after enrichment with alkaline peptone water (APW) against the culture method for monitoring the progress of cholera outbreaks in rural setting.
methodsWe conducted the study between March and June 2015. Fresh stool samples and rectal swabs were incubated in 1% APW for 6 h at room temperature before testing with RDT following the manufacturer's instruction. The same stool sample was cultured to isolate V. cholerae in the standard manner. We also reviewed patient registers to epidemiologically describe the cholera epidemic.
resultsWe tested stool from 102 consenting suspected cholera patients reporting during daytime at Bwera Hospital (n = 69), Kilembe Mines Hospital (n = 4) and Kinyabwama Health Centre (n = 29). Ninety one (91) samples were positive and nine samples were negative according to both methods. One (1) sample was positive only by dipstick and one sample was positive only by culture (sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, Positive Predictive Value of 99% and Negative Predictive Value of 90%). Overall, 146 suspected cholera cases and two deaths, (case fatality rate of 1.36%) were recorded during the study period. Among the cases aged 1-9 years, 63% (50/79) were males while in those aged 20-49 years, 76% (34/45) were females.
conclusionsOur findings showed that the modified dipstick test after enrichment with 1% APW had high level of accuracy in detection of V. cholerae and is quick, affordable alternative cholera outbreak monitoring tool in resource constrained settings. However, culture method should remain for cholera epidemic confirmation, for monitoring of antibiotic sensitivity and for production of pure isolates for molecular characterization. Further studies should be done to better understand the observed age and sex case distribution, in Kasese district.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.