Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29157206›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species isolated from the immunocompromised patients admitted to ten university hospitals in Iran: comparison of colonizing and infecting isolates.

Parisa Badiee, Hamid Badali, Teun Boekhout, Kambiz Diba, Abdolkarim Ghadimi Moghadam, Ali Hossaini Nasab, Hadis Jafarian, Rasoul Mohammadi, Hossein Mirhendi, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phenotypic and Molecular Assessment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antifungal Resistance of ClinicalIranian journal of public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Sulforaphane Anti-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A case of central nervous system infection byMedical mycology case reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High prevalence of itraconazole resistance amongCurrent medical mycology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Parisa BadieeProf. Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. badieep@sums.ac.ir.
Hamid BadaliDepartment of Medical Mycology and Parasitology/Invasive Fungi Research Centre (IFRC), School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Teun BoekhoutWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Kambiz DibaUrmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Abdolkarim Ghadimi MoghadamDepartment of Pediatrics, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Ali Hossaini NasabDepartment of Pediatrics, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran.
Hadis JafarianProf. Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Rasoul MohammadiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hossein MirhendiDepartment of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, School of Public Health and Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Javad NajafzadehDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ahmad ShamsizadehInfectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Ahwaz Jundishapur University of Medical Scienses, Ahvaz, Iran.
Jafar SoltaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Besat Tertiary Hospital, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRKurdistan University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUrmia University of Medical SciencesWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute · NLYasuj University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntifungal susceptibility testing is a subject of interest in the field of medical mycology. The aim of the present study were the distributions and antifungal susceptibility patterns of various Candida species isolated from colonized and infected immunocompromised patients admitted to ten university hospitals in Iran.

methodsIn totally, 846 Candida species were isolated from more than 4000 clinical samples and identified by the API 20 C AUX system. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method according to CLSI.

resultsThe most frequent Candida species isolated from all patients was Candida albicans (510/846). The epidemiological cutoff value and percentage of wild-type species for amphotericin B and fluconazole in Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata and Candida krusei were 0.5 μg/ml (95%) and 4 μg/ml (96%); 1 μg/ml (95%) and 8 μg/ml (95%); 0.5 μg/ml (99%) and 19 μg/ml (98%); and 4 μg/ml (95%) and 64 μg/ml (95%), respectively. The MIC90 and epidemiological cutoff values to posaconazole in Candida krusei were 0.5 μg/ml. There were significant differences between infecting and colonizing isolates of Candida tropicalis in MIC 90 values of amphotericin B, and isolates of Candida glabrata in values of amphotericin B, caspofungin, and voriconazole (P < 0.05).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the susceptibility patterns of Candida species (colonizing and infecting isolates) in immunocompromised patients are not the same and acquired resistance was seen in some species.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCandidaCaspofunginCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFemaleFluconazoleHospitals, UniversityHumansIranLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTriazolesAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFluconazoleLipopeptidesposaconazoleTriazolesVoriconazoleCandida AlbicansCandida infected patientsCandida susceptibility testingCandida wild-typeColonizing Candida

Identifiers

PMID29157206
PMCPMC5697407
OpenAlexW2768723539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.