Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29156708›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

A preclinical evaluation of the MEK inhibitor refametinib in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines including those with acquired resistance to trastuzumab or lapatinib.

John O'Shea, Mattia Cremona, Clare Morgan, Malgorzata Milewska, Frankie Holmes, Virginia Espina, Lance Liotta, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Sinead Toomey, Stephen F Madden and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John O'SheaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Mattia CremonaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Clare MorganDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Malgorzata MilewskaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Frankie HolmesTexas Oncology-Memorial Hermann Memorial City, US Oncology Research, Houston, TX, USA.
Virginia EspinaGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Lance LiottaGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sinead ToomeyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Stephen F MaddenData Science Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Aoife CarrDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Naomi ElsterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Bryan T HennessyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Alex J EustaceDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland.
Beaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEGeorge Mason University · USTexas Oncology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe MEK/MAPK pathway is commonly activated in HER2-positive breast cancer, but little investigation of targeting this pathway has been undertaken. Here we present the results of an

methodsA panel of HER2-positive breast cancer cells were profiled for mutational status and also for anti-proliferative response to refametinib alone and in combination with the PI3K inhibitor (PI3Ki) copanlisib and the HER2-targeted therapies trastuzumab and lapatinib. Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) was used to determine the effect of refametinib alone and in combination with PI3Ki and HER2-inhibitors on expression and phosphorylation of proteins in the PI3K/AKT and MEK/MAPK pathways. We validated our proteomic

resultsRefametinib has anti-proliferative effects when used alone in 2/3 parental HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines (HCC1954, BT474), along with 3 models of these 2 cell lines with acquired trastuzumab or lapatinib resistance (6 cell lines tested). Refametinib treatment led to complete inhibition of MAPK signalling. In HCC1954, the most refametinib-sensitive cell line (IC

conclusionRefametinib alone or in combination with copanlisib or lapatinib could represent an improved treatment strategy for some patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, and should be considered for clinical trial evaluation. The direct down-regulation of MEK/MAPK but not AKT signalling by HER2 inhibition (e.g. by lapatinib or trastuzumab), which we demonstrate occurs in 18% of HER2-positive breast cancers may serve as a potential biomarker of responsiveness to the MEK inhibitor refametinib.

Indexed as

acquired resistance to HER2-targeted therapiesHER2-positive breast cancerMEK inhibitorreverse phase protein array

Identifiers

PMID29156708
PMCPMC5689598
OpenAlexW2739276623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.