ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017
New Insights into the Microbiota of Moth Pests.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Genomics and Enzymatic Diversity of Gut Bacteria in Apis mellifera: A Multi-Approach Study from India.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Shift patterns of internal bacterial communities across five life stages of laboratory-maintainedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Variation and functional profile of gut bacteria in the scarab beetle, Anomala dimidiata, under a cellulose-enriched microenvironment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Yeast communities related to honeybees: occurrence and distribution in flowers, gut mycobiota, and bee products.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Deciphering the complex interplay between gut microbiota and crop residue breakdown in forager and hive bees (Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Article
- DeconstructingiScience · 2023Article
- Impact of gut microbiota composition on black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon (hufnagel) metabolic indices and pesticide degradation.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
- Population Dynamics of IntestinalMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Effects of midgut bacteria in Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) on nuclear polyhedrosis virus and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2023Article
- Uncovering the Microbiota of BagwormTropical life sciences research · 2023Article
- "Ectomosphere": Insects and Microorganism Interactions.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Article
- Microbiome analysis ofPeerJ · 2023Article
- Article
- Effect of Diet on the Midgut Microbial Composition and Host Immunity of the Fall Armyworm,Biology · 2022Article
- Biological control needs evolutionary perspectives of ecological interactions.Evolutionary applications · 2022Review
- Fungi are more transient than bacteria in caterpillar gut microbiomes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Intestinal Bacterial Diversity and Functional Analysis of Three Lepidopteran Corn Ear Worm Larvae.Insects · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have helped to improve our understanding of the bacterial communities associated with insects, shedding light on their wide taxonomic and functional diversity. To date, little is known about the microbiota of lepidopterans, which includes some of the most damaging agricultural and forest pests worldwide. Studying their microbiota could help us better understand their ecology and offer insights into developing new pest control strategies. In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the microbiota of lepidopterans with a focus on pests, and highlight potential recurrent patterns regarding microbiota structure and composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.