ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Survey on the Performance of Source Localization Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinated Positioning Method for Shortwave Anti-Multipath Based on Bayesian Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Tri-Satellite Interference Source Localization Method for Eliminating Mirrored Location.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Experimental Results of Partial Discharge Localization in Bounded Domains.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An Efficient NLOS Errors Mitigation Algorithm for TOA-Based Localization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Underwater Target Localization and Synchronization for a Distributed SIMO Sonar with an Isogradient SSP and Uncertainties in Receiver Locations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Variability of the UHF Signals Generated by Partial Discharges in Mineral Oil.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Improving the Error of Time Differences of Arrival on Partial Discharges Measurement in Gas-Insulated Switchgear.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- NLOS Identification and Positioning Algorithm Based on Localization Residual in Wireless Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- An Outlier Detection Method Based on Mahalanobis Distance for Source Localization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Influence of Waveform Characteristics on LiDAR Ranging Accuracy and Precision.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- A Novel Passive Tracking Scheme Exploiting Geometric and Intercept Theorems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The localization of emitters using an array of sensors or antennas is a prevalent issue approached in several applications. There exist different techniques for source localization, which can be classified into multilateration, received signal strength (RSS) and proximity methods. The performance of multilateration techniques relies on measured time variables: the time of flight (ToF) of the emission from the emitter to the sensor, the time differences of arrival (TDoA) of the emission between sensors and the pseudo-time of flight (pToF) of the emission to the sensors. The multilateration algorithms presented and compared in this paper can be classified as iterative and non-iterative methods. Both standard least squares (SLS) and hyperbolic least squares (HLS) are iterative and based on the Newton-Raphson technique to solve the non-linear equation system. The metaheuristic technique particle swarm optimization (PSO) used for source localisation is also studied. This optimization technique estimates the source position as the optimum of an objective function based on HLS and is also iterative in nature. Three non-iterative algorithms, namely the hyperbolic positioning algorithms (HPA), the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and Bancroft algorithm, are also presented. A non-iterative combined algorithm, MLE-HLS, based on MLE and HLS, is further proposed in this paper. The performance of all algorithms is analysed and compared in terms of accuracy in the localization of the position of the emitter and in terms of computational time. The analysis is also undertaken with three different sensor layouts since the positions of the sensors affect the localization; several source positions are also evaluated to make the comparison more robust. The analysis is carried out using theoretical time differences, as well as including errors due to the effect of digital sampling of the time variables. It is shown that the most balanced algorithm, yielding better results than the other algorithms in terms of accuracy and short computational time, is the combined MLE-HLS algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.