Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29156402›Full record

Observational studyThe International journal on drug policy2018

Effect of initiating drug treatment on the risk of drug-related poisoning death and acquisitive crime among offending heroin users.

Matthias Pierce, Sheila M Bird, Matthew Hickman, John Marsden, Graham Dunn, Toby Seddon, Tim Millar

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The International journal on drug policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias PierceSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address: matthias.pierce@manchester.ac.uk.
Sheila M BirdMRC Biostatistics Unit at University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew HickmanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.
John MarsdenAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Graham DunnSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Toby SeddonSchool of Law, University of Manchester, UK.
Tim MillarSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000021Medical Research Council MC_U105260794Medical Research Council MR/J013560/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent Cochrane review of randomised trials identified a lack of evidence for interventions provided to drug-using offenders. We use routine data to address whether contact with treatment services reduces heroin users' likelihood of a future acquisitive offence or drug-related poisoning (DRP) death.

methodsHeroin-users were identified from probation assessments and linked to drug-treatment, mortality and offending records. The study cohort was selected to ensure that the subject was not: in prison, in treatment or had recently left treatment. Subjects were classed as initiators if they attended a triage appointment within two weeks of their assessment; non-initiators otherwise. Initiator and non-initiators were compared over a maximum of one year, with respect to their risk of recorded acquisitive offence or DRP-death. Balance was sought using propensity score matching and missing data were accounted for using multiple imputation.

resultsNine percent of assessments identified for analysis were classed as initiators. Accounting for observed confounding and missing data, there was a reduction in DRPs associated with initiator assessments, however there was uncertainty around this estimate such that a null-effect could not be ruled out (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.17-1.04). There was no evidence of a decrease in the recidivism risk, in fact the analysis showed a small increase (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18).

conclusionFor heroin-using offenders, initial contact with treatment services does not appear to reduce the likelihood of a future acquisitive offence.

Indexed as

CriminalsHeroin DependenceAdultCause of DeathCrimeFemaleHeroinHumansMaleNarcoticsUnited KingdomHeroinNarcoticsAcquisitive offendingDrug-related poisoning deathHeroin usersObservational studyOffendingTreatment

Identifiers

PMID29156402
PMCPMC5788328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.