Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29156383›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2018

Diagnosis of Distant Metastasis of Lung Cancer: Based on Clinical and Radiomic Features.

Hongyu Zhou, Di Dong, Bojiang Chen, Mengjie Fang, Yue Cheng, Yuncun Gan, Rui Zhang, Liwen Zhang, Yali Zang, Zhenyu Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural and functional radiomics for lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hongyu ZhouPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Ave., SZ University Town, Shenzhen, China, 518055; CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Di DongCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Bojiang ChenDepartment of respiratory and critical care medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Mengjie FangCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yue ChengDepartment of respiratory and critical care medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yuncun GanDepartment of respiratory and critical care medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of respiratory and critical care medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Liwen ZhangCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yali ZangCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zhenyu LiuCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Hairong ZhengPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Ave., SZ University Town, Shenzhen, China, 518055. Electronic address: hr.zheng@siat.ac.cn.
Weimin LiDepartment of respiratory and critical care medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. Electronic address: weimin003@163.com.
Jie TianCAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: tian@ieee.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the distant metastasis possibility based on computed tomography (CT) radiomic features in patients with lung cancer.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 348 patients with lung cancer enrolled between 2014 and February 2015. A feature set containing clinical features and 485 radiomic features was extracted from the pretherapy CT images. Feature selection via concave minimization (FSV) was used to select effective features. A support vector machine (SVM) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of each feature.

resultsFour radiomic features and three clinical features were obtained by FSV feature selection. Classification accuracy by the proposed SVM with SGD method was 71.02%, and the area under the curve was 72.84% with only the radiomic features extracted from CT. After the addition of clinical features, 89.09% can be achieved.

conclusionThe radiomic features of the pretherapy CT images may be used as predictors of distant metastasis. And it also can be used in combination with the patient's gender and tumor T and N phase information to diagnose the possibility of distant metastasis in lung cancer.

Identifiers

PMID29156383
PMCPMC5697996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.