SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2018
Fundamental nursing care: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Oral health interventions and strategies delivered by care workers to older people living in care homes: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Oral Health Care: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Missed nursing care in acute care hospital settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Human resources for health · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions to optimise nutrition in older people in hospitals and long-term care: Umbrella review.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of COVID-19 and other infectious conditions requiring isolation on the provision of and adaptations to fundamental nursing care in hospital in terms of overall patient experience, care quality, functional ability, and treatment outcomes: systematic review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Pooled it
- Optimizing patients' functional status during daily nursing care interventions: A systematic review.Research in nursing & health · 2020Pooled it
- Patients' and nurses' experiences of fundamental nursing care: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2020Pooled it
- Fundamental nursing care: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene.Journal of clinical nursing · 2018Pooled it
- Can cognitive-motor training improve physical functioning and psychosocial wellbeing in nursing home residents? A randomized controlled feasibility study as part of the PROCARE project.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021Trial
- Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Trial
- Nursing research on physical, relational and psychosocial care for older people in Germany: protocol for a mapping review guided by the Fundamentals of Care Framework.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Nursing practice in relation to older people's fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Integration of the fundamental of care framework into the clinic (the CONFORM study): A quasi-experimental pre-post implementation study protocol.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025Review
- The Quality of Fundamental Care as Perceived by Nurses and Patients in a Hospital Setting: A Descriptive Comparative Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- The ILC Maine statement: Time for the fundamental care [r]evolution.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Missing Fundamental Nursing Care: What's the Extent of Missed Oral Care? A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo determine the effects of nursing interventions for people's nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs.
backgroundPatient experience of health care is sensitive to nursing quality. A refocus on fundamental nursing care is undermined by lack of evidence of effectiveness for interventions in core areas such as elimination, nutrition, mobility and hygiene.
designSystematic review.
methodsWe searched for and included experimental studies on interventions by professionally qualified and unregistered nurses that addressed participants' nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs. We extracted data on scope, quality and results of studies followed by descriptive narrative synthesis of included study outcomes using a novel form of harvest plots.
resultsWe included 149 studies, 35 nutrition, 56 elimination, 16 mobility, 39 hygiene and three addressing two or more areas simultaneously (67 randomised controlled trials, 32 non-randomised controlled trials and 50 uncontrolled trials). Studies into interventions on participant self-management of nutrition (n = 25), oral health (n = 26), catheter care (n = 23) and self-management of elimination (n = 21) were the most prevalent. Most studies focussed their outcomes on observational or physiological measures, with very few collecting patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, experience or self-reported symptoms. All but 13 studies were of low quality and at significant risk of bias. The majority of studies did not define primary outcomes, included multiple measures of identical concepts, used inappropriate analyses and did not conform to standard reporting quality criteria.
conclusionsThe current evidence for fundamental nursing care interventions is sparse, of poor quality and unfit to provide evidence-based guidance to practising nurses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Researchers in nursing internationally should now undertake a programme of work to produce evidence for clinical practice in the fundamentals of care that is reliable, replicable and robust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.