ArticleAnnals of botany2018
Optimizing soil-coring strategies to quantify root-length-density distribution in field-grown maize: virtual coring trials using 3-D root architecture models.
Article in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial and Texture Analysis of Root System distribution with Earth mover's Distance (STARSEED).Plant methods · 2023Article
- Root system architecture and environmental flux analysis in mature crops using 3D root mesocosms.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Resources for image-based high-throughput phenotyping in crops and data sharing challenges.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Super resolution for root imaging.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- An Analysis of Soil Coring Strategies to Estimate Root Depth in Maize (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Root distribution has a major influence on soil exploration and nutrient and water acquisition by plants. Soil coring is a well-known way to estimate root distribution. However, identifying an optimal core-sampling strategy is important if one is to strike the right balance between the high cost of making field estimates of root length density (RLD) vs. the need for accurate estimates. Virtual assessment of competing soil-coring strategies, based on three-dimensional (3-D) models of root system architecture (RSA), is a highly effective way to find that balance. Methods: The trajectories of the axile roots of two maize cultivars having contrasting axile root angles were measured in the field using in situ 3-D digitization. Lateral roots were also measured by recording topological and geometrical parameters. Based on the measurement dataset obtained, contrasting 3-D RSA models of individual maize plants were constructed in which the different lateral rooting angles were represented. Using these RSA models the accuracies of various core-sampling strategies for estimating RLD were assessed in a series of virtual experiments. Key Results: Substantial biases occur if a one-core sampling strategy is used to estimate RLD. The biases largely remain for two-core sampling, although a weighting method can reduce these. However, given that identification of an optimal weighting method is difficult in practice, a new sampling strategy is proposed based on an area-weighting algorithm. In this way low deviations in RLD estimation can be achieved by sampling between rows and also by using larger-diameter (7.5 or 10 cm) cores. Conclusions: A 3-D root architecture model based on a detailed measurement dataset provides an ideal platform for assessing a range of soil-coring strategies. The improved two-core sampling strategy, based on an area-weighting algorithm, shows considerable promise as a cost-efficient way of obtaining good quality RLD estimates for maize.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.