Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29155816›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Liposomal amphotericin B in travelers with cutaneous and muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis: Not a panacea.

Romain Guery, Benoit Henry, Guillaume Martin-Blondel, Claire Rouzaud, Florence Cordoliani, Gundel Harms, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Françoise Foulet, Emmanuelle Bourrat, Michel Baccard and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic potential of iron oxide nanoparticles for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review ofThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Romain GueryService de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-7799
Benoit HenryService de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Guillaume Martin-BlondelService des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU de Toulouse, INSERM U1043-CNRS UMR 5282, Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Claire RouzaudService de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Florence CordolianiService de Dermatologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot-Paris VII, Paris, France.
Gundel HarmsInstitute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jean-Pierre GangneuxService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Rennes, INSERM U1085, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Françoise FouletUnité de Mycologie, Département de Biologie-Pathologie, CHU Henri Mondor, DHU VIC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
Emmanuelle BourratService de Pédiatrie Général, Hôpital Robert Debré, Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot-Paris VII, Paris, France.
Michel BaccardService de Dermatologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot-Paris VII, Paris, France.
Gloria MorizotPlateforme ICAReB, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Paul-Henri ConsignyCentre Médical de l'Institut Pasteur, Consultation de Maladies Infectieuses, Tropicales et de Médecine des Voyages, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Antoine BerryService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Toulouse, INSERM U1043-CNRS UMR 5282, Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Johannes BlumSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Olivier LortholaryService de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Pierre BuffetINTS, Unité Biologie Intégrée du Globule Rouge, Laboratoire d'Excellence GR-Ex, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
French Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Study group & the LeishMan network
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInserm · FRSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex cutaneous and muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL and MCL) often requires systemic therapy. Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has a strong potential for a solid clinical benefit in this indication.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a French centralized referral treatment program and from the "LeishMan" European consortium database. All patients with parasitologically proven CL or MCL who received at least one dose of L-AmB were included. Positive outcome was based on ulcer closure as per recent WHO workshop guidelines.

resultsFrom 2008 through 2016, 43 travelers returning from 18 countries (Old World n = 28; New World n = 15) were analyzed with a median follow-up duration of 79 days [range 28-803]. Main clinical forms were: localized CL with one or multiple lesions (n = 32; 74%) and MCL (n = 8; 19%). As per published criteria 19 of 41 patients (46%) were cured 90 days after one course of L-AmB. When the following items -improvement before day 90 but no subsequent follow-up, delayed healing (>3 months) and healing after a second course of L-AmB- were included in the definition of cure, 27 of 43 patients (63%) had a positive outcome. Five patients (MCL = 1; CL = 4) experienced a relapse after a median duration of 6 months [range 3-27] post treatment and 53% of patients (23/43) experienced at least one adverse event including severe hypokalaemia and acute cardiac failure (one patient each). In multivariate analysis, tegumentary infection with L. infantum was associated with complete healing after L-AmB therapy (OR 5.8 IC 95% [1.03-32]) while infection with other species had no impact on outcome.

conclusionIn conditions close to current medical practice, the therapeutic window of L-AmB was narrow in travellers with CL or MCL, with the possible exception of those infected with L. infantum. Strict follow-up is warranted when using L-AmB in patients with mild disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, MucocutaneousMaleMiddle AgedAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal Agentsliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID29155816
PMCPMC5714383
OpenAlexW2769220249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.