Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29155442›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2018

Safety of folic acid.

Martha S Field, Patrick J Stover

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha S FieldDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Patrick J StoverDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Homeostatic Regulation of Folate MetabolismR37DK058144 · NIDDK · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI STOVER, PATRICK J · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
GENE-NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS IN NEURAL TUBE DEFECTSR01HD059120 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI STOVER, PATRICK J · 2008 to 2018
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059120NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK058144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large body of literature demonstrating the efficacy of maternal folic acid intake in preventing birth defects, as well as investigations into potential adverse consequences of consuming folic acid above the upper intake level (UL). Recently, two authoritative bodies convened expert panels to assess risks from high intakes of folic acid: the U.S. National Toxicology Program and the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Overall, the totality of the evidence examined by these panels, as well as studies published since the release of their reports, have not established risks for adverse consequences resulting from existing mandatory folic acid fortification programs that have been implemented in many countries. Current folic acid fortification programs have been shown to support public health in populations, and the exposure levels are informed by and adherent to the precautionary principle. Additional research is needed to assess the health effects of folic acid supplement use when the current upper limit for folic acid is exceeded.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitive DysfunctionDiabetes MellitusDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidFood, FortifiedHumansHypersensitivityInfant, NewbornMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseNeoplasmsNeural Tube DefectsNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelPregnancyFolic Acidcancerfolatefolic acidneural tube defectssafety

Identifiers

PMID29155442
PMCPMC5849489
OpenAlexW2778878669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.