Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29155419›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Catching hidden variation: systematic correction of reference minor allele annotation in clinical variant calling.

Yury A Barbitoff, Igor V Bezdvornykh, Dmitrii E Polev, Elena A Serebryakova, Andrey S Glotov, Oleg S Glotov, Alexander V Predeus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interpretation of genomic sequencing: variants should be considered uncertain until proven guilty.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yury A BarbitoffBioinformatics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Igor V BezdvornykhBioinformatics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitrii E PolevBiobank of the Research Park, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Elena A SerebryakovaBiobank of the Research Park, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey S GlotovBiobank of the Research Park, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Oleg S GlotovDepartment of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander V PredeusBioinformatics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeWe comprehensively assessed the influence of reference minor alleles (RMAs), one of the inherent problems of the human reference genome sequence.MethodsThe variant call format (VCF) files provided by the 1000 Genomes and Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) consortia were used to identify RMA sites. All coding RMA sites were checked for concordance with UniProt and the presence of same codon variants. RMA-corrected predictions of functional effect were obtained with SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and PROVEAN standalone tools and compared with dbNSFP v2.9 for consistency.ResultsWe systematically characterized the problem of RMAs and identified several possible ways in which RMA could interfere with accurate variant discovery and annotation. We have discovered a systematic bias in the automated variant effect prediction at the RMA loci, as well as widespread switching of functional consequences for variants located in the same codon as the RMA. As a convenient way to address the problem of RMAs we have developed a simple bioinformatic tool that identifies variation at RMA sites and provides correct annotations for all such substitutions. The tool is available free of charge at http://rmahunter.bioinf.me.ConclusionCorrection of RMA annotation enhances the accuracy of next-generation sequencing-based methods in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AllelesGenetic VariationAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29155419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.