ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2017
Reconstructing phylogenetic tree using a protein-protein interaction technique.
Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Silico Screening ofBiologics : targets & therapy · 2025Article
- Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a novel substitution method for finding potential protein-protein interactions (PPIs) has been discussed. This newly designed method for analyzing PPI also aids in the comparison of evolutionary distances. The method deals with various data sets, and additionally performs measurable assessment to determine PPIs is introduced. PPIs are biologically relevant and aid in better conceptual framework of phylogenetic profiling. The newly designed framework gives vision to relate the topological properties of the system with evolutionary behavior of datasets. Firstly, this study found that the most conserved protein motifs exist at the roots of the system, whereas newer motifs with mutations have a tendency to dwell on the branches. In-depth functional analysis revealed that the most conserved motifs have high specificity for improved structural procedures and pathway engagements, which may help identify their formative parts in cells. In conclusion, this study demonstrates several important aspects for future studies focusing to enhance phylogenetic profiling systems. This study can also be used effectively to utilize such strategies to develop new biological insights which will further lead to understanding of disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.