Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29155401›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2017

Reconstructing phylogenetic tree using a protein-protein interaction technique.

Shamita Malik, Dolly Sharma, Sunil Kumar Khatri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In Silico Screening ofBiologics : targets & therapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shamita MalikAmity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India. mailtoshamita07@gmail.com.
Dolly SharmaComputer Science and Engineering Department, Shiv Nadar University, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sunil Kumar KhatriAmity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a novel substitution method for finding potential protein-protein interactions (PPIs) has been discussed. This newly designed method for analyzing PPI also aids in the comparison of evolutionary distances. The method deals with various data sets, and additionally performs measurable assessment to determine PPIs is introduced. PPIs are biologically relevant and aid in better conceptual framework of phylogenetic profiling. The newly designed framework gives vision to relate the topological properties of the system with evolutionary behavior of datasets. Firstly, this study found that the most conserved protein motifs exist at the roots of the system, whereas newer motifs with mutations have a tendency to dwell on the branches. In-depth functional analysis revealed that the most conserved motifs have high specificity for improved structural procedures and pathway engagements, which may help identify their formative parts in cells. In conclusion, this study demonstrates several important aspects for future studies focusing to enhance phylogenetic profiling systems. This study can also be used effectively to utilize such strategies to develop new biological insights which will further lead to understanding of disease mechanisms.

Indexed as

PhylogenyProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsDatasets as TopicMutationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID29155401
PMCPMC8676049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.