Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29155227›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2018

Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.

Archana Radhakrishnan, Sarah A Nowak, Andrew M Parker, Kala Visvanathan, Craig E Pollack

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A National Physician Survey Examining Switching From Sulfonylureas or Insulin to Newer Diabetes Medications.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Archana RadhakrishnanDivision of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: arra@umich.edu.
Sarah A NowakRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States.
Andrew M ParkerRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Kala VisvanathanDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Craig E PollackDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USRAND Corporation · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
A Network Analytic Approach to Modeling Variation in Prostate Cancer CareK07CA151910 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POLLACK, CRAIG EVAN · 2011 to 2015
$780k
The Impact of Provider Social Networks on Breast Cancer ScreeningR21CA194194 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NOWAK, SARAH A, POLLACK, CRAIG EVAN · 2016 to 2017
$429k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151910NCI NIH HHS R21 CA194194NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite changes to breast cancer screening guidelines intended to decrease screening in younger and older women, mammography rates remain high. We investigated physician attitudes towards screening younger and older women. Surveys were mailed to US primary care providers and gynecologists between May and September 2016 (871/1665, 52.3% adjusted response rate). We assessed physician (1) attitudes towards screening younger (45-49years) and older (75+ years) women and (2) recommendations for routine mammography. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying themes among physician attitudes and created measures standardized to a 5-point scale. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined associations between physician attitudes and screening recommendations. Attitudes identified with factor analysis included: potential regret, expectations, and discordant guidelines (referred to as potential regret), patient-related hazards due to screening, physician limitations and uncertainty, and concerns about rationing care. Gynecologists had higher levels of potential regret compared to internists. In adjusted analyses, physicians with increasing potential regret (1-point increment on 5-point scale) had higher odds of recommending mammography to younger (OR 8.68; 95% CI 5.25-14.36) and older women (OR 4.62; 95% CI 3.50-6.11). Increasing concern for patient-related hazards was associated with decreased odds of recommending screening to older women (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.83). Physicians were more motivated by potential regret in recommending screening for younger and older women than by concerns for patient-related hazards in screening. Addressing physicians' most salient concerns, such as fear of missing cancer diagnoses and malpractice, may present an important opportunity to improving delivery of guideline-concordant cancer screening.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuideline AdherenceGynecologyHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesBreast cancerCancer screeningGuidelinesGynecologyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID29155227
PMCPMC5846094
OpenAlexW2770406792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.