ArticlePreventive medicine2018
Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Endocrinologists' Perspectives on Early Screening for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Phenomenological Study in Four Chinese Based Hospitals.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- A National Physician Survey Examining Switching From Sulfonylureas or Insulin to Newer Diabetes Medications.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Implementation of WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment: knowledge and perceptions of health providers from Argentina.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A National Survey of Physicians' Views on the Importance and Implementation of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- A National Physician Survey of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2023Article
- Different Types of Patient Health Information Associated With Physician Decision-making Regarding Cancer Screening Cessation for Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Discontinuing Cancer Screening for Older Adults: a Comparison of Clinician Decision-Making for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screenings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: A qualitative study.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Patient and Clinician Characteristics That Predict Breast Cancer Screening Behavior in 40-49-Year-Old Women.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021Article
- Regret and Therapeutic Decisions in Multiple Sclerosis Care: Literature Review and Research Protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.BMC health services research · 2020Review
- Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors.The American journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Assessment of Clinician Decision-making on Cancer Screening Cessation in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Scrutinizing screening: a critical interpretive review of primary care provider perspectives on mammography decision-making with average-risk women.Public health reviews · 2018Review
- Screening Mammography for Young Women in Israel: Between Guidelines and Common Practice.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite changes to breast cancer screening guidelines intended to decrease screening in younger and older women, mammography rates remain high. We investigated physician attitudes towards screening younger and older women. Surveys were mailed to US primary care providers and gynecologists between May and September 2016 (871/1665, 52.3% adjusted response rate). We assessed physician (1) attitudes towards screening younger (45-49years) and older (75+ years) women and (2) recommendations for routine mammography. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying themes among physician attitudes and created measures standardized to a 5-point scale. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined associations between physician attitudes and screening recommendations. Attitudes identified with factor analysis included: potential regret, expectations, and discordant guidelines (referred to as potential regret), patient-related hazards due to screening, physician limitations and uncertainty, and concerns about rationing care. Gynecologists had higher levels of potential regret compared to internists. In adjusted analyses, physicians with increasing potential regret (1-point increment on 5-point scale) had higher odds of recommending mammography to younger (OR 8.68; 95% CI 5.25-14.36) and older women (OR 4.62; 95% CI 3.50-6.11). Increasing concern for patient-related hazards was associated with decreased odds of recommending screening to older women (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.83). Physicians were more motivated by potential regret in recommending screening for younger and older women than by concerns for patient-related hazards in screening. Addressing physicians' most salient concerns, such as fear of missing cancer diagnoses and malpractice, may present an important opportunity to improving delivery of guideline-concordant cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.