Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29154904›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2018

Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?

Brian P Calio, Abhinav Sidana, Dordaneh Sugano, Sonia Gaur, Mahir Maruf, Amit L Jain, Maria J Merino, Peter L Choyke, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian P CalioUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: brian.calio@jefferson.edu.
Abhinav SidanaUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: Abhinavsidana01@gmail.com.
Dordaneh SuganoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sonia GaurMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mahir MarufUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Amit L JainUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Maria J MerinoCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute and Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Prostate Cancer ImagingZ01BC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to determine whether saturation of the index lesion during magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy would decrease the rate of pathological upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed a prospectively maintained, single institution database for patients who underwent fusion and systematic biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy in 2010 to 2016. Index lesion was defined as the lesion with largest diameter on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. In patients with a saturated index lesion transrectal fusion biopsy targets were obtained at 6 mm intervals along the long axis of the index lesion. In patients with a nonsaturated index lesion only 1 target was obtained from the lesion. Gleason 6, 7 and 8-10 were defined as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively.

resultsIncluded in the study were 208 consecutive patients, including 86 with a saturated and 122 with a nonsaturated lesion. Median patient age was 62.0 years (IQR 10.0) and median prostate specific antigen was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 8.0). The median number of biopsy cores per index lesion was higher in the saturated lesion group (4 vs 2, p <0.001). The risk category upgrade rate from systematic only, fusion only, and combined fusion and systematic biopsy results to prostatectomy was 40.9%, 23.6% and 13.8%, respectively. The risk category upgrade from combined fusion and systematic biopsy results was lower in the saturated than in the nonsaturated lesion group (7% vs 18%, p = 0.021). There was no difference in the upgrade rate based on systematic biopsy between the 2 groups. However, fusion biopsy results were significantly less upgraded in the saturated lesion group (Gleason upgrade 20.9% vs 36.9%, p = 0.014 and risk category upgrade 14% vs 30.3%, p = 0.006).

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that saturation of the index lesion significantly decreases the risk of upgrading on radical prostatectomy by minimizing the impact of tumor heterogeneity.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalProstate-Specific Antigenimage-guided biopsyneoplasm gradingpathologyprostatic neoplasmsrisksurgical

Identifiers

PMID29154904
PMCPMC7983157
OpenAlexW2768484936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.