Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29154644›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2018

A longitudinal analysis of adolescent decision-making with the Iowa Gambling Task.

Brandon Almy, Michael Kuskowski, Stephen M Malone, Evan Myers, Monica Luciana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Childhood unpredictability and the development of exploration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon AlmyInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota.
Michael KuskowskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Stephen M MaloneDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Evan MyersDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Monica LucianaCenter for Neurobehavioral Development, University of Minnesota.

Funding

Adolescent Brain Development and Effects of Drug AbuseR01DA017843 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUCIANA, MONICA · 2004 to 2008
$2.8M
Disrupted development of neural connections by alcohol initiation in adolescenceR01AA020033 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LUCIANA, MONICA · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
National Science FoundationNIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020033NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many researchers have used the standard Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making in adolescence given increased risk-taking during this developmental period. Most studies are cross-sectional and do not observe behavioral trajectories over time, limiting interpretation. This longitudinal study investigated healthy adolescents' and young adults' IGT performance across a 10-year span. A total of 189 individuals (aged 9-23 at baseline) completed a baseline session and were followed at 2-year intervals yielding 5 time-points. IGT deck contingencies were shuffled over time to reduce practice effects. IGT performance (good minus bad decisions) was measured at each assessment point and separated into 3 metrics: overall performance (all blocks), decision-making under ambiguity (blocks 1 and 2), and decision-making under risk (blocks 3, 4, and 5). Covariates included estimated intelligence and affective dispositions as measured by the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation System (BIS/BAS) Scales. A linear effect of age yielded the best fit when comparing linear and quadratic effects of age on overall IGT performance. Age and intelligence positively predicted overall performance, whereas affective approach tendencies (BAS) negatively predicted overall performance. Practice effects were observed and controlled for. Models of ambiguity and risk metrics yielded different patterns of significant predictors. Age predicted better performance and affective approach tendencies predicted worse performance for both metrics. Intelligence was a significant predictor for risk, but not ambiguity. This longitudinal study extends prior work by showing age-related improvements in reward-based decision-making and associating those improvements with cognitive and affective variables. Implications of the results for adolescent development are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Decision MakingGamblingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntelligenceLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, PsychologicalProspective StudiesPsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID29154644
PMCPMC5886802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.