Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29154609›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2018

Influence of sedentary, social, and physical alternatives on food reinforcement.

Katelyn A Carr, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Daily social resources as a buffer against stress eating and its consequences.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Reinforcer pathology's alternative reinforcer hypothesis: A preliminary examination.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katelyn A CarrDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Can reinforcing alternatives to food prevent weight gain in children?R01HD088131 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the potential for nonfood alternative activities to compete with the reinforcing value of food. Participants rated the frequency and pleasantness of engaging in a variety of activities and made hypothetical choices between food and 4 types of alternatives; cognitive-enriching (reading, listening to music), social (attending a party or event), sedentary (watching TV), and physically active (running, biking).

methodTwo-hundred seventy-six adults completed an online survey using a crowdsourcing platform.

resultsAdults with higher BMI reported engaging in fewer activities within the cognitive-enriching, social, and physically active categories. When examining how well each alternative activity type was able to compete with food, sedentary alternatives were associated with the highest food reinforcement, or were least able to compete with food reinforcers, as compared with cognitive-enriching, social, and physical. Social activities were associated with the lowest food reinforcement, or the best able to compete with food reinforcers.

conclusionThese results suggest that increasing the frequency and range of nonfood alternative activities may be important to obesity. This study also suggests that the class of social activities may have the biggest impact on reducing food reinforcement, and the class of sedentary may have the smallest effect on food reinforcement. These tools have relevance to clinical interventions that capitalize on increasing access to behaviors that can reduce the motivation to eat in clinical interventions for obesity. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleFoodHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSedentary BehaviorSocial ChangeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29154609
PMCPMC5794615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.