Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29154476›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of community psychology2017

Valuing Our Communities: Ethical Considerations for Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Prevention.

Max Crowley, Damon Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of community psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investing in Custodial Grandparents: Cost Analysis of the Social Intelligence Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max CrowleyDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
Damon JonesDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.

Funding

STRATIFIED CLUSTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL (SCRT) OF A CLINICAL DECISION RULE (CDR) FOR ABUSIVE HEAD TRAUMA (AHT)P50HD089922 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Hannah Milena Caroline Schreier · 2017 to 2026
$16.9M
Scientific Meetings for Advancing Economic Analyses of Substance Abuse PreventionR13DA036339 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, KENNETH A · 2014 to 2015
$38k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD089922NIDA NIH HHS R13 DA036339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restricted public budgets and increasing efforts to link the impact of community interventions to public savings have increased the use of economic evaluation. While this type of evaluation can be important for program planning, it also raises important ethical issues about how we value the time of local stakeholders who support community interventions. In particular, researchers navigate issues of scientific accuracy, institutional inequality, and research utility in their pursuit of even basic cost estimates. We provide an example of how we confronted these issues when estimating the costs of a large-scale community-based intervention. Principles for valuing community members' time and conducting economic evaluations of community programs are discussed.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansPreventive Health ServicesProgram DevelopmentPsychologyTimeCommunity-based preventionCost analysisEconomic evaluationEthics

Identifiers

PMID29154476
PMCPMC5729092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.