Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29153464›Full record

GuidelineRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2018

International guideline for the delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Anne W Lee, Wai Tong Ng, Jian Ji Pan, Sharon S Poh, Yong Chan Ahn, Hussain AlHussain, June Corry, Cai Grau, Vincent Grégoire, Kevin J Harrington and 16 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 152 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04376866 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Toripalimab in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Local-regional Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2028Enrolled204ConditionsRecurrent Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaArmsToripalimab
NCT04992988 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Toripalimab for Local-regional Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsNasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Toripalimab, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsToripalimab
NCT07303023 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Individualized Versus Standard Neck Prophylactic Irradiation in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Non-inferiority, Phase III, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2025 to 2031Enrolled462ConditionsNasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)ArmsIndividualized Neck Irradiation, Standard Neck Irradiation
NCT07661771 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Individualized Primary Clinical Target Volume Based on Margin Expansion for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Non-Inferiority, Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2026 to 2034Enrolled568ConditionsNon-metastatic Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaArmsComprehensive Therapy Based on Tumor Stage, IMRT with Primary Clinical Target Volume Based on Margin Expansion, IMRT with Consensus Primary Clinical Target Volume
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. SEOM-TTCC clinical guideline for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-TTCC clinical guideline in nasopharynx cancer (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Anne W LeeDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Tong NgDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong.
Jian Ji PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian l Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Sharon S PohDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Yong Chan AhnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hussain AlHussainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
June CorryRadiation Oncology, GenesisCare, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Cai GrauDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Vincent GrégoireDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Université catholique de Louvain, St-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Royal Marsden/The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Chao Su HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China.
Dora L KwongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Johannes A LangendijkDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Quynh Thu LeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, NRG Oncology and HNCIG, USA.
Nancy Y LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Jin Ching LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tai Xiang LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
William M MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Brian O'SullivanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada.
Enis OzyarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lester J PetersPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
David I RosenthalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Yoke Lim SoongDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Yungan TaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Sue S YomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California - San Francisco, USA.
Joseph T WeeDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. Electronic address: joseph.wee.t.s@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13407Medical Research Council MR/M009068/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTarget delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) often proves challenging because of the notoriously narrow therapeutic margin. High doses are needed to achieve optimal levels of tumour control, and dosimetric inadequacy remains one of the most important independent factors affecting treatment outcome.

methodA review of the available literature addressing the natural behaviour of NPC and correlation between clinical and pathological aspects of the disease was conducted. Existing international guidelines as well as published protocols specified by clinical trials on contouring of clinical target volumes (CTV) were compared. This information was then summarized into a preliminary draft guideline which was then circulated to international experts in the field for exchange of opinions and subsequent voting on areas with the greatest controversies.

resultsCommon areas of uncertainty and variation in practices among experts experienced in radiation therapy for NPC were elucidated. Iterative revisions were made based on extensive discussion and final voting on controversial areas by the expert panel, to formulate the recommendations on contouring of CTV based on optimal geometric expansion and anatomical editing for those structures with substantial risk of microscopic infiltration.

conclusionThrough this comprehensive review of available evidence and best practices at major institutions, as well as interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, this set of consensus guidelines has been developed to provide a practical reference for appropriate contouring to ensure optimal target coverage. However, the final decision on the treatment volumes should be based on full consideration of individual patients' factors and facilities of an individual centre (including the quality of imaging methods and the precision of treatment delivery).

Indexed as

CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedConsensusHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaClinical target volume (CTV)DelineationGross target volume (GTV)GuidelineNasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.