Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29152671›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2018

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Provides Insights into Differentially Expressed Genes and Long Non-Coding RNAs between Ovary and Testis of the Mud Crab (Scylla paramamosain).

Xiaolong Yang, Mhd Ikhwanuddin, Xincang Li, Fan Lin, Qingyang Wu, Yueling Zhang, Cuihong You, Wenhua Liu, Yinwei Cheng, Xi Shi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of Sex-Related Genes from the Three-Spot Swimming CrabAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaolong YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Mhd IkhwanuddinInstitute of Tropical Aquaculture, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.
Xincang LiEast China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Fan LinGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Qingyang WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Yueling ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Cuihong YouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Wenhua LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Yinwei ChengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Xi ShiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Shuqi WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Hongyu MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China. mahy@stu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-503X
Shantou University · CNChinese Academy of Fishery Sciences · CNUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MY

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772837the STU Scientific Research Foundation for Talents NTF17006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular mechanism underlying sex determination and gonadal differentiation of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) has received considerable attention, due to the remarkably biological and economic differences between sexes. However, sex-biased genes, especially non-coding genes, which account for these differences, remain elusive in this crustacean species. In this study, the first de novo gonad transcriptome sequencing was performed to identify both differentially expressed genes and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) between male and female S. paramamosain by using Illumina Hiseq2500. A total of 79,282,758 and 79,854,234 reads were generated from ovarian and testicular cDNA libraries, respectively. After filtrating and de novo assembly, 262,688 unigenes were produced from both libraries. Of these unigenes, 41,125 were annotated with known protein sequences in public databases. Homologous genes involved in sex determination and gonadal development pathways (Sxl-Tra/Tra-2-Dsx/Fru, Wnt4, thyroid hormone synthesis pathway, etc.) were identified. Three hundred and sixteen differentially expressed unigenes were further identified between both transcriptomes. Meanwhile, a total of 233,078 putative lncRNAs were predicted. Of these lncRNAs, 147 were differentially expressed between sexes. qRT-PCR results showed that nine lncRNAs negatively regulated the expression of eight genes, suggesting a potential role in sex differentiation. These findings will provide fundamental resources for further investigation on sex differentiation and regulatory mechanism in crustaceans.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsBrachyuraFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleOvaryRNA, Long NoncodingSex Determination ProcessesTestisRNA, Long NoncodinglncRNAsRNA sequencingScylla paramamosainSex differentiationUnigenes

Identifiers

PMID29152671
OpenAlexW2770745599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.