Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29152146›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Breast tissue, oral and urinary microbiomes in breast cancer.

Hannah Wang, Jessica Altemus, Farshad Niazi, Holly Green, Benjamin C Calhoun, Charles Sturgis, Stephen R Grobmyer, Charis Eng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Changes in the fecal microbiota of breast cancer patients based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mammary Gland Microbiota in Benign Breast Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah WangGenomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jessica AltemusGenomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Farshad NiaziGenomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Holly GreenSurgical Oncology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Benjamin C CalhounDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Charles SturgisDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Stephen R GrobmyerCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Charis EngGenomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCleveland Clinic · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been proposed that the gut microbiome contributes to breast carcinogenesis by modifying systemic estrogen levels. This is often cited as a possible mechanism linking breast cancer and high-fat, low-fiber diets as well as antibiotic exposure, associations previously identified in population-based studies. More recently, a distinct microbiome has been identified within breast milk and tissue, but few studies have characterized differences in the breast tissue microbiota of patients with and without cancer, and none have investigated distant body-site microbiomes outside of the gut. We hypothesize that cancerous breast tissue is associated with a microbiomic profile distinct from that of benign breast tissue, and that microbiomes of more distant sites, the oral cavity and urinary tract, will reflect dysbiosis as well. Fifty-seven women with invasive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and 21 healthy women undergoing cosmetic breast surgery were enrolled. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified from urine, oral rinse and surgically collected breast tissue, sequenced, and processed through a QIIME-based bioinformatics pipeline. Cancer patient breast tissue microbiomes clustered significantly differently from non-cancer patients (

Indexed as

breast cancermetagenomicsmicrobiomeoralurine

Identifiers

PMID29152146
PMCPMC5675698
OpenAlexW2764154885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.