Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151869›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary applications2017

When evolution is the solution to pollution: Key principles, and lessons from rapid repeated adaptation of killifish (

Andrew Whitehead, Bryan W Clark, Noah M Reid, Mark E Hahn, Diane Nacci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew WhiteheadDepartment of Environmental Toxicology University of California Davis Davis CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-6449
Bryan W ClarkAtlantic Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education US Environmental Protection Agency Narragansett RI USA.
Noah M ReidDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology University of Connecticut Storrs CT USA.
Mark E HahnDepartment of Biology Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4358-2082
Diane NacciAtlantic Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development US Environmental Protection Agency Narragansett RI USA.

Funding

Training CoreP42ES007381 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SHERR, DAVID H · 1995 to 2019
$46.1M
Mechanisms of reproductive, developmental, and early life stage impacts of marineR01ES021934 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GALVEZ, FERNANDO, GREEN, CHRISTOPHER C · 2012 to 2015
$452k
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007381NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For most species, evolutionary adaptation is not expected to be sufficiently rapid to buffer the effects of human-mediated environmental changes, including environmental pollution. Here we review how key features of populations, the characteristics of environmental pollution, and the genetic architecture underlying adaptive traits, may interact to shape the likelihood of evolutionary rescue from pollution. Large populations of Atlantic killifish

Indexed as

adaptationcontemporary evolutionecological geneticsecotoxicologygenomics/proteomicsmolecular evolutionnatural selection and contemporary evolutionpopulation genetics—empirical

Identifiers

PMID29151869
PMCPMC5680427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.