Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151853›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary applications2017

In situ conservation-harnessing natural and human-derived evolutionary forces to ensure future crop adaptation.

Mauricio R Bellon, Ehsan Dulloo, Julie Sardos, Imke Thormann, Jeremy J Burdon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unveiling yellow rust resistance in the near-Himalayan region: insights from a nested association mapping study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mauricio R BellonComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) México City México.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-3402
Ehsan DullooBioversity International Maccarese Italy.
Julie SardosBioversity France Montpellier Cedex 5 France.
Imke ThormannBioversity International Maccarese Italy.
Jeremy J BurdonCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture & Food (CSIRO) Canberra ACT Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the availability of the broadest possible germplasm base for agriculture in the face of increasingly uncertain and variable patterns of biotic and abiotic change is fundamental for the world's future food supply. While ex situ conservation plays a major role in the conservation and availability of crop germplasm, it may be insufficient to ensure this. In situ conservation aims to maintain target species and the collective genotypes they represent under evolution. A major rationale for this view is based on the likelihood that continued exposure to changing selective forces will generate and favor new genetic variation and an increased likelihood that rare alleles that may be of value to future agriculture are maintained. However, the evidence that underpins this key rationale remains fragmented and has not been examined systematically, thereby decreasing the perceived value and support for in situ conservation for agriculture and food systems and limiting the conservation options available. This study reviews evidence regarding the likelihood and rate of evolutionary change in both biotic and abiotic traits for crops and their wild relatives, placing these processes in a realistic context in which smallholder farming operates and crop wild relatives continue to exist. It identifies areas of research that would contribute to a deeper understanding of these processes as the basis for making them more useful for future crop adaptation.

Indexed as

agricultureconservationcrop wild relativeslandracesplant genetic resources

Identifiers

PMID29151853
PMCPMC5680627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.