Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151668›Full record

ArticleJournal Of Elasticity2017

Bulging brains.

J Weickenmeier, P Saze, C A M Butler, P G Young, A Goriely, E Kuhl

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal Of Elasticity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04094974 (The Usefulness of the Combination of Preoperative Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Heart Rate Variability to Predict Intraoperative Brain Condition in Patients With Supratentorial Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04094974 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Usefulness of the Combination of Preoperative Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Heart Rate Variability to Predict Intraoperative Brain Condition in Patients With Supratentorial Tumors

TypeobservationalSponsorDyAnsys, Inc.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled58ConditionsSupratentorial Brain TumorsArmsANSiscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Solid Stress Estimations via Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Patients with Brain Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanical Characterization and Modeling of the Porcine Cerebral Meninges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J WeickenmeierDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, weickenmeier@stanford.edu.
P SazeLaboratori de Calcul Numeric, Universitat Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona-Tech, 08034 Barcelona, Spain, pablo.saez@upc.edu.
C A M ButlerSynopsys/Simpleware, Bradninch Hall, Castle Street, Exeter EX4 3PL, UK.
P G YoungCollege of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
A GorielyMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK, goriely@maths.ox.ac.uk.
E KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, ekuhl@stanford.edu.

Funding

Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain swelling is a serious condition associated with an accumulation of fluid inside the brain that can be caused by trauma, stroke, infection, or tumors. It increases the pressure inside the skull and reduces blood and oxygen supply. To relieve the intracranial pressure, neurosurgeons remove part of the skull and allow the swollen brain to bulge outward, a procedure known as decompressive craniectomy. Decompressive craniectomy has been preformed for more than a century; yet, its effects on the swollen brain remain poorly understood. Here we characterize the deformation, strain, and stretch in bulging brains using the nonlinear field theories of mechanics. Our study shows that even small swelling volumes of 28 to 56 ml induce maximum principal strains in excess of 30%. For radially outward-pointing axons, we observe maximal normal stretches of 1.3 deep inside the bulge and maximal tangential stretches of 1.3 around the craniectomy edge. While the stretch magnitude varies with opening site and swelling region, our study suggests that the locations of maximum stretch are universally shared amongst all bulging brains. Our model has the potential to inform neurosurgeons and rationalize the shape and position of the skull opening, with the ultimate goal to reduce brain damage and improve the structural and functional outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in trauma patients.

Indexed as

braincraniectomyfinite element analysishyperelasticityneuromechanicsSoft matterswelling

Identifiers

PMID29151668
PMCPMC5687257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.