ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2018
Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
254 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- GWAS meta-analysis of psoriasis identifies new susceptibility alleles impacting disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- European and multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of atopic dermatitis highlights importance of systemic immune regulation.Nature communications · 2023Pooled it
- NAT2 global landscape: Genetic diversity and acetylation statuses from a systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson's Genetics Research: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022Pooled it
- Differential and shared genetic effects on kidney function between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.Communications biology · 2022Pooled it
- Discovery and prioritization of variants and genes for kidney function in >1.2 million individuals.Nature communications · 2021Pooled it
- Population genetic considerations for using biobanks as international resources in the pandemic era and beyond.BMC genomics · 2021Pooled it
- Mind the brain gap: The worldwide distribution of neuroimaging research on adolescent depression.NeuroImage · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Health inequalities in precision medicine: A systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- "There's no representation": a qualitative study of attitudes and motivations towards genomic research participation among Australian South Asians.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Exploring Current Perspectives on a Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Genetic Counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Genetic Landscape of Hearing Loss in Brazilian Patients Reveals Population-Specific Variants and Clinical Correlations.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
- VN1K is a pangenome-informed multi-omics and phenomics resource for the Vietnamese population.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Association of rs4977574 with Lipid Phenotypes, Smoking Status, and Statin Exposure in a Saudi Cardiovascular Cohort: A Sensitivity-Adjusted Genetic Association Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Building and applying pangenome references to capture genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Joint modeling of whole-genome sequencing data for human height via approximate message passing.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- EXaCT-2: an augmented and customizable oncology-focused whole exome sequencing platform.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the imperatives of including diverse and under-represented individuals in human genomics research and the striking gaps in attaining that inclusion. With its multidecade experience in supporting research and policy efforts in human genomics, the National Human Genome Research Institute is committed to establishing foundational approaches to study the role of genomic variation in health and disease that include diverse populations. Large-scale efforts to understand biology and health have yielded key scientific findings, lessons and recommendations on how to increase diversity in genomic research studies and the genomic research workforce. Increased attention to diversity will increase the accuracy, utility and acceptability of using genomic information for clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.