Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151449›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2018

Prevalence and associated factors of foot and ankle pain among nurses at a university hospital in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

Maki Tojo, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Naoko Amano, Akemi Ito, Machiko Futono, Yasunori Sato, Takako Naka, Seiji Kimura, Aya Sadamasu, Ryuichiro Akagi and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of the injuries caused by occupational footwear.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Stability of Three Different Sanitary Shoes on Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  5. Pain manifestations in nursing professionals: a scoping review.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025
    Article
  6. [Nomographic Model for Predicting Severe Foot Pain in Nurses from Tertiary Hospitals in China].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Correlation of Frequency of Work-Related Disorders with Type of Work among Polish Employees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maki TojoNursing Department, Chiba University Hospital.
Satoshi YamaguchiCollage of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Chiba University.
Naoko AmanoNursing Department, Chiba University Hospital.
Akemi ItoNursing Department, Chiba University Hospital.
Machiko FutonoNursing Department, Chiba University Hospital.
Yasunori SatoChiba University Hospital Clinical Research Center.
Takako NakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Chiba Prefectural University of Health Sciences.
Seiji KimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.
Aya SadamasuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.
Ryuichiro AkagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University.
Chiba University · JPChiba University Hospital · JPChiba Prefectural University of Health Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purposes of this study were to clarify 1) the prevalence of foot and ankle pain and 2) the factors associated with foot and ankle pain among nurses.

methodsNurses working at a university hospital in Japan were recruited to participate in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. The occurrence of foot and ankle pain in the previous month was assessed by using the Standardized Nordic Questionnaire and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Subjects also answered questions on footwear-related factors, including using the visual analog scale for shoe comfort. In addition, information on personal factors and psychosocial factors was collected using the Job Content Questionnaire. The relationships between the presence of foot and ankle pain and the associated factors were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis.

resultsResponses of 636 nurses (response rate, 67%) were included for analysis. The prevalence of foot and ankle pain was 23% and 51% when using the Standardized Nordic Questionnaire and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index, respectively. The prevalence of pain that prevented the nurses from performing activities of daily living and work was 4% and 17%, respectively. A low level of shoe comfort, personal factors (age and body mass index), and psychosocial factors (low job control and high job strain) was independently associated with the presence of foot and ankle pain.

conclusionsFoot and ankle pain occurred frequently in nurses. Shoe comfort, personal factors, and psychosocial factors were associated with foot and ankle pain.

Indexed as

Ankle JointFootActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInternal-External ControlJapanLife StyleLogistic ModelsMaleAnkleFootFootwearNursePainShoe comfort

Identifiers

PMID29151449
PMCPMC5886880
OpenAlexW2768410791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.