Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151369›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2018

Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of the metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Yue Tian, Lijun Su, Jiantao Wang, Xiaolin Duan, Xiubo Jiang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Metabolic Syndrome and Coronary Artery Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue Tian1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Qingdao University,No. 38 Dengzhou Road,Qingdao,Shandong Province,266021People's Republic of China.
Lijun Su2Department of the Library,Qingdao University,Qingdao,Shandong Province,People's Republic of China.
Jiantao Wang1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Qingdao University,No. 38 Dengzhou Road,Qingdao,Shandong Province,266021People's Republic of China.
Xiaolin Duan1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Qingdao University,No. 38 Dengzhou Road,Qingdao,Shandong Province,266021People's Republic of China.
Xiubo Jiang1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,School of Public Health,Qingdao University,No. 38 Dengzhou Road,Qingdao,Shandong Province,266021People's Republic of China.
Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSeveral epidemiological studies have been performed to evaluate the association of fruit and vegetable consumption with risk of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), but the results remain controversial. Thus, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis to assess the associations of fruit or/and vegetable consumption with risk of MetS, separately.

designWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases up to July 2017 for relevant available articles. Pooled OR with 95 % CI were calculated with the fixed- or random-effects model.

resultsA total of nine studies for fruit consumption, nine studies for vegetable consumption and seven studies for fruit and vegetable consumption were identified as eligible for the present meta-analysis. The pooled OR (95 % CI) of MetS for the highest v. lowest category were 0·87 (0·82, 0·92; I 2=46·7 %) for fruit consumption, 0·85 (0·80, 0·91; I 2=0·0 %) for vegetable consumption and 0·76 (0·62, 0·93; I 2=83·5 %) for fruit and vegetable consumption. In subgroup analyses stratified by continent where the study was conducted, the inverse association of fruit consumption (0·86 (0·77, 0·96)) and vegetable consumption (0·86 (0·80, 0·92)) with risk of MetS remained significant in Asia. There was no evidence of small-study effect.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis indicates that fruit or/and vegetable consumption may be inversely associated with risk of MetS. It suggests that people should consume more fruits and vegetables to decrease the risk of MetS.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorFruitVegetablesAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedYoung AdultFruitsMeta-analysisMetabolic syndromeVegetables

Identifiers

PMID29151369
PMCPMC10260986
OpenAlexW2770958054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.