ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018
Correction to: A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000-2016.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The intellectual base and research fronts of LGR5: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Review
- Trends in physical activity research for breast cancer - A bibliometric analysis of the past ten years.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Effects of mitochondrial dysfunction on bone metabolism and related diseases: a scientometric study from 2003 to 2022.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Research Trends around Exercise Rehabilitation among Cancer Patients: A Bibliometrics and Visualized Knowledge Graph Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes.
Identifiers
29151183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.