Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151179›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2018

Comparison of three analgesic drug regimens with twelfth subcostal nerve block for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Miguel Maldonado-Avila, Leopoldo Mateo Garduño-Arteaga, Roberto Alejandro Vela-Mollinedo, Jorge Jaspersen-Gastelum, Francisco Virgen-Gutierrez, Marcos Del Rosario-Santiago, Victor Rios-Davila

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel Maldonado-AvilaHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico. mimalavi@yahoo.com.
Leopoldo Mateo Garduño-ArteagaHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Alejandro Vela-MollinedoHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Jaspersen-GastelumHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisco Virgen-GutierrezHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marcos Del Rosario-SantiagoHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Victor Rios-DavilaHospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hospital General de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the first-line treatment in the majority of cases of upper urinary tract stones. Since its introduction, attempts have been made to establish the ideal accompanying analgesic method to enable the application of shock waves of adequate duration and intensity for efficacious stone fragmentation. An open, randomized, prospective, longitudinal, comparative, and experimental clinical study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of subcostal nerve block with lidocaine, comparing it in combination with tramadol or diclofenac for pain control during ESWL. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy patients of both sexes were included in the study. Thirty-five were men and 35 were women, all above 18 years of age, with kidney stones or ureteral stones smaller than 20 mm. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1 (24 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml of lidocaine 2%, 5 min before ESWL. Group 2 (25 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml lidocaine 2% + intramuscular diclofenac sodium 45 min before ESWL. Group 3 (21 patients) Twelfth subcostal nerve block with 10 ml of lidocaine 2% + tramadol at 1 mg/Kg of weight, 45 min before ESWL. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was applied at minutes 10, 20, and 30 of the procedure.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were reported by the ANOVA test for comparing the mean pain values between the three groups at minutes 10, 20, and 30 of the ESWL. There were no adverse effects.

conclusionsEven though there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups, the analgesic regimen of twelfth subcostal nerve block with lidocaine 2%, alone, was as efficacious as its combination with other analgesics and therefore can be used as a sole analgesic method during ESWL.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacFemaleHumansIntercostal NervesKidney CalculiLidocaineLithotripsyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPainAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacLidocaineTramadolExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyKidneysObstructionParavertebral blockStoneUreter

Identifiers

PMID29151179
OpenAlexW2770013780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.