Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29151174›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

The impact of remission status on patients' experiences with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an exploratory analysis of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.

Neha Kayastha, Steven P Wolf, Susan C Locke, Gregory P Samsa, Areej El-Jawahri, Thomas W LeBlanc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neha KayasthaDuke University School of Medicine, Box: DUMC 2927, Durham, NC, 27703, USA.
Steven P WolfDuke Cancer Institute, Box: DUMC 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Susan C LockeDuke Cancer Institute, Box: DUMC 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Gregory P SamsaDuke Cancer Institute, Box: DUMC 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Areej El-JawahriDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Thomas W LeBlancDuke University School of Medicine, Box: DUMC 2927, Durham, NC, 27703, USA. thomas.leblanc@duke.edu.

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
American Cancer Society 128776-MRSG-15-185-01-PCSMFoundation for the National Institutes of Health UL1TR001117NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShared decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires understanding patients' longitudinal experiences of illness, but little is known about the impact of remission status on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We aimed to explore the association between remission status and PROs 6-12 months following induction chemotherapy.

methodsForty-two patients completed three validated instruments characterizing symptom burden (Patient Care Monitor v2.0), distress (NCCN Distress Thermometer), and QOL (FACT-Leu), as part of a longitudinal observational study. We used regression models to explore the relationship between remission status and PROs, and explore differences by initial disease type (de novo versus secondary/relapsed AML).

resultsThose with secondary or relapsed AML at study onset had marked impairments in all measures compared to de novo AML patients. After 6 months, their mean distress score was 4.8 (> 4.0 warrants intervention), they reported a mean of 14.1 moderate/severe symptoms and had a mean QOL score of 113.6, compared to 1.0, 1.7, and 155.2, respectively, for those with de novo AML (p < .0001). Similarly, patients in relapse had a mean distress score of 5.3, a mean of 12.8 moderate/severe symptoms, and a mean QOL score of 113.4, compared to 1.8, 5.7, and 143.8, respectively, among those in remission (p < .005). These patterns persisted after adjusting for baseline differences (p < .0001).

conclusionRemission is associated with markedly better patient well-being in AML. Patients with secondary or relapsed AML face more severe symptom burden, distress, and QOL issues after induction. Interventions are needed to improve AML patients' experiences of illness.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRemission InductionAcute myeloid leukemiaDistressPatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeRemissionSymptom burden

Identifiers

PMID29151174
PMCPMC5921898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.