ArticleChromosoma2018
Impact of Xist RNA on chromatin modifications and transcriptional silencing maintenance at different stages of imprinted X chromosome inactivation in vole Microtus levis.
Article in Chromosoma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- SETDB1 and HUSH modulate Xist RNA levels during establishment of X chromosome inactivation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- SETDB1 knockdown boosts recombinant protein in CHO cells via epigenetic transcriptional silencing.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Deletion of the XIST promoter from the human inactive X chromosome compromises polycomb heterochromatin maintenance.Chromosoma · 2021Article
- Epigenetic changes during aging and their reprogramming potential.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2019Review
- The Role of Xist in X-Chromosome Dosage Compensation.Trends in cell biology · 2018Review
- Loss of SETDB1 decompacts the inactive X chromosome in part through reactivation of an enhancer in the IL1RAPL1 gene.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vole Microtus levis, cells of preimplantation embryo and extraembryonic tissues undergo imprinted X chromosome inactivation (iXCI) which is triggered by a long non-coding nuclear RNA, Xist. At early stages of iXCI, chromatin of vole inactive X chromosome is enriched with the HP1 heterochromatin-specific protein, trimethylated H3K9 and H4K20 attributable to constitutive heterochromatin. In the study, using vole trophoblast stem (TS) cells as a model of iXCI, we further investigated chromatin of the inactive X chromosome of M. levis and tried to find out the role of Xist RNA. We demonstrated that chromatin of the inactive X chromosome in vole TS cells also contained the SETDB1 histone methyltransferase and KAP1 protein. In addition, we observed that Xist RNA did not contribute significantly to maintenance of X chromosome inactive state during iXCI in vole TS cells. Xist repression affected neither transcriptional silencing caused by iXCI nor maintenance of trimethylated H3K9 and H4K20 as well as HP1, KAP1, and SETDB1 on the inactive X chromosome. Moreover, the unique repertoire of chromatin modifications on the inactive X chromosome in vole TS cells could be disrupted by a chemical compound, DZNep, and then restored even in the absence of Xist RNA. However, Xist transcript was necessary for recruitment of an additional repressive histone modification, trimethylated H3K27, to the inactive X chromosome during vole TS cell differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.