Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150995›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2018

Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Paolo Zamboni, Luigi Tesio, Stefania Galimberti, Luca Massacesi, Fabrizio Salvi, Roberto D'Alessandro, Patrizia Cenni, Roberto Galeotti, Donato Papini, Roberto D'Amico and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01371760 (Randomized Multi-centered Study for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Angioplastic Surgery of the Extracranial Veins in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Studio Randomizzato Multicentrico Per la Valutazione Dell'Efficacia e Sicurezza Dell'Intervento di Disostruzione Delle Vene Extracraniche Nel Trattamento Della Sclerosi Multipla), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01371760 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Multi-centered Study for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Angioplastic Surgery of the Extracranial Veins in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Studio Randomizzato Multicentrico Per la Valutazione Dell'Efficacia e Sicurezza Dell'Intervento di Disostruzione Delle Vene Extracraniche Nel Trattamento Della Sclerosi Multipla

TypeinterventionalSponsorS. Anna HospitalRan2012 to 2015Enrolled212ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Venous InsufficiencyArmsVenous PTA, Catheter Venography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of Venous Angioplasty on Cerebral Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Expanded Analysis of the Brave Dreams Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A case series of infectious complications in medical tourists requiring hospital admission or outpatient home parenteral therapy.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Developmental venous anomalies in patients with multiple sclerosis: is that a coincidence or an ancillary finding?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The eagle jugular syndrome.BMC neurology · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo ZamboniTranslational Surgery and Vascular Diseases Centre, University of Ferrara Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi TesioDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Chair of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefania GalimbertiCenter of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Luca MassacesiDepartment of Neurosciences Drugs and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fabrizio SalviInstitute of the Neurological Science, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto D'AlessandroInstitute of the Neurological Science, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Patrizia CenniNeuroradiology, Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
Roberto GaleottiInterventional Radiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Donato PapiniRegional Agency for Health and Social Care, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Roberto D'AmicoDepartment of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Silvana SimiMS Cochrane Group. Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Maria Grazia ValsecchiCenter of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Graziella FilippiniScientific Director's Office, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Brave Dreams Research Group
University of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · ITRegione Emilia-RomagnaUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain and spinal cord. Whether this condition is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and whether venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is beneficial in persons with MS and CCSVI is controversial. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of venous PTA in patients with MS and CCSVI. Design, Setting, and Participants: We analyzed 177 patients with relapsing-remitting MS; 62 were ineligible, including 47 (26.6%) who did not have CCSVI on color Doppler ultrasonography screening. A total of 115 patients were recruited in the study timeframe. All patients underwent a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial in 6 MS centers in Italy. The trial began in August 2012 and concluded in March 2016; data were analyzed from April 2016 to September 2016. The analysis was intention to treat. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to either venous PTA or catheter venography without venous angioplasty (sham). Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary end points were assessed at 12 months: (1) a composite functional measure (ie, walking control, balance, manual dexterity, postvoid residual urine volume, and visual acuity) and (2) a measure of new combined brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, including the proportion of lesion-free patients. Combined lesions included T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions plus new or enlarged T2 lesions. Results: Of the included 115 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, 76 were allocated to the PTA group (45 female [59%]; mean [SD] age, 40.0 [10.3] years) and 39 to the sham group (29 female [74%]; mean [SD] age, 37.5 [10.6] years); 112 (97.4%) completed follow-up. No serious adverse events occurred. Flow restoration was achieved in 38 of 71 patients (54%) in the PTA group. The functional composite measure did not differ between the PTA and sham groups (41.7% vs 48.7%; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.68; P = .49). The mean (SD) number of combined lesions on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 to 12 months were 0.47 (1.19) in the PTA group vs 1.27 (2.65) in the sham group (mean ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03: adjusted P = .09) and were 1.40 (4.21) in the PTA group vs 1.95 (3.73) in the sham group at 0 to 12 months (mean ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.32-1.63; P = .45; adjusted P = .45). At follow-up after 6 to 12 months, 58 of 70 patients (83%) in the PTA group and 22 of 33 (67%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.11-6.28; P = .03; adjusted P = .09). At 0 to 12 months, 46 of 73 patients (63.0%) in the PTA group and 18 of 37 (49%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.81-4.01; P = .15; adjusted P = .30). Conclusion and Relevance: Venous PTA has proven to be a safe but largely ineffective technique; the treatment cannot be recommended in patients with MS. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01371760.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultAgedAngioplastyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedItalyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29150995
PMCPMC5833494
OpenAlexW2770694056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.