Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150868›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2018

Patient-reported health outcomes in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: results from a large-scale observational study analysing effects of diagnoses and disease progression.

W G Philipp-Dormston, K Müller, B Novak, K Strömer, C Termeer, U Hammann, J W Glutsch, G Krähn-Senftleben, H Lübbert, M Koller and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

W G Philipp-DormstonHautzentrum Köln (Cologne Dermatology), Köln, Germany.
K MüllerCentre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
B NovakBiofrontera Pharma GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
K StrömerProfessional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD), Mönchengladbach, Germany.
C TermeerHautarztpraxis am Löwenmarkt, Dematology Practice, Stuttgart, Germany.
U HammannHautarztpraxis Dr. med. Urte Hammann, Dermatology Practice, Stade, Germany.
J W GlutschHautarztpraxis Dr. med. J. W. Glutsch, Dermatology Practice, Karlsruhe, Germany.
G Krähn-SenftlebenHautzentrum Donau Alb, Dermatology Practice, Blaubeuren, Germany.
H LübbertBiofrontera Pharma GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
M KollerCentre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
R M SzeimiesDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Vest Clinic, Recklinghausen, Germany.
NMSC-QoL Study Group
Biofrontera (Germany) · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEBerufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen · DEElbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DEKlinik Donaustauf · DEKlinikum Vest · DEUniversidad del Mar · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratosis (AK) are very common among fair-skinned individuals. A disease continuum from AK to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been frequently postulated. AK and NMSC may influence quality of life (QL) of patients, and it can be suspected that disease progression entails a QL reduction. The purpose of this study was to document QL in patients with NMSC and AK using the health-outcome questionnaire EQ-5D-5L.

methodsThe study was designed as a non-interventional, prospective, cross-sectional study. Patients with AK, SCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or multiple diagnoses were enrolled in this study in 29 dermatological centres across Germany. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L (compromising EQ Index and EQ VAS), and the dermatologists provided diagnosis, disease history and treatment data.

resultsA total of 1184 patients were enrolled and diagnosed as follows: 73% AK, 49% BCC and 17% SCC. 66% had a single diagnosis, 28% two different diagnoses and 6% three different diagnoses. QL was strongly associated with patients' diagnosis. Patients with a single AK diagnosis had significantly higher mean EQ VAS (78) than patients with BCC (74), SCC (72), and BCC plus SCC (69), P < 0.050. When the effects of disease progression were calculated, patients with AK plus SCC reported significantly less mean EQ VAS (71) than patients with a single AK diagnosis (78), P < 0.011.

conclusionsWhile rarely being imminently life-threatening, NMSC and AK have an impact on QL as quantified by the EQ-5D-5L. This impact is associated with diagnosis (AK vs. NMSC) and clinical progression (AK vs. AK plus SCC). Both lead to a clear decline in QL. This shows that disease progression is perceived and judged as detrimental by patients and that AK and NMSC should be diligently treated to preserve and restore QL.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBasal Cell CarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKeratosis, ActinicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29150868
PMCPMC6032898
OpenAlexW2769132434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.