Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150846›Full record

ReviewImmunology2018

Cancer stem cells as targets for immunotherapy.

Amy S Codd, Takayuki Kanaseki, Toshihiko Torigo, Zsuzsanna Tabi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Biomarkers and targeted therapy for cancer stem cells.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy S CoddDivision of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Takayuki KanasekiDepartment of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Toshihiko TorigoDepartment of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Zsuzsanna TabiDivision of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-1809
Cardiff University · GBSapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current cancer therapies target the bulk of the tumour, while a population of highly resistant tumour cells may be able to repopulate the tumour and metastasize to new sites. Cancer cells with such stem cell-like characteristics can be identified based on their phenotypical and/or functional features which may open up ways for their targeted elimination. In this review we discuss potential off-target effects of inhibiting cancer stem-cell self-renewal pathways on immune cells, and summarize some recent immunological studies specifically targeting cancer stem cells based on their unique antigen expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsAntigensantigens/peptides/epitopesimmunotherapystem cellT-celltumour immunology

Identifiers

PMID29150846
PMCPMC5795182
OpenAlexW2770066059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.