Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150799›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018

A hybrid approach based on logistic classification and iterative contrast enhancement algorithm for hyperintense multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Antonio Carlos da Silva Senra Filho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [A multi-label fusion based level set method for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Antonio Carlos da Silva Senra Filho, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil. acsenrafilho@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9689-6053

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 201871/2015-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease with increasing importance in recent years, in which the T2 weighted with fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI imaging technique has been addressed for the hyperintense MS lesion assessment. Many automatic lesion segmentation approaches have been proposed in the literature in order to assist health professionals. In this study, a new hybrid lesion segmentation approach based on logistic classification (LC) and the iterative contrast enhancement (ICE) method is proposed (LC+ICE). T1 and FLAIR MRI images from 32 secondary progressive MS (SPMS) patients were used in the LC+ICE method, in which manual segmentation was used as the ground truth lesion segmentation. The DICE, Sensitivity, Specificity, Area under the ROC curve (AUC), and Volume Similarity measures showed that the LC+ICE method is able to provide a precise and robust lesion segmentation estimate, which was compared with two recent FLAIR lesion segmentation approaches. In addition, the proposed method also showed a stable segmentation among lesion loads, showing a wide applicability to different disease stages. The LC+ICE procedure is a suitable alternative to assist the manual FLAIR hyperintense MS lesion segmentation task.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveBrainHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisLogistic classificationMRIMultiple sclerosisSegmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.