Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150665›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A streamlined cloning workflow minimising the time-to-strain pipeline for Pichia pastoris.

Kate E Royle, Karen Polizzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Scarless Genetic Engineering ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Preparation of Bispecific IgY-scFvs Inhibition Adherences of EnterotoxigenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate E RoyleDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Karen PolizziDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. k.polizzi@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5435-2667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recent advances in E. coli self-assembly have greatly simplified cloning, these have not yet been harnessed for the high-throughput generation of expression strains in the early research and discovery phases of biopharmaceutical production. Here, we have refined the technique and incorporated it into a streamlined workflow for the generation of Pichia pastoris expression strains, reducing the timeline by a third and removing the reliance on DNA editing enzymes, which often require troubleshooting and increase costs. We have validated the workflow by cloning 24 human proteins of biopharmaceutical value, either as direct therapeutics or as research targets, which span a continuous range in size and GC content. This includes demonstrating the applicability of the workflow to three-part assemblies for a monoclonal antibody and its single-chain antibody fragments derivatives. This workflow should enable future research into recombinant protein production by P. pastoris and a synthetic biology approach to this industrial host.

Indexed as

Base CompositionCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPichiaPlasmidsSingle-Chain AntibodiesTime FactorsTransformation, GeneticSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID29150665
PMCPMC5693959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.