ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Rapid and Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Based Mating-Type Switching of
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Underlying Reversible Adaptive Responses in Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Influence of Ploidy and Genetic Background on Stress Tolerance of Intraspecific Yeast Hybrids.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Predicting epistasis across proteins by structural logic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- How and when organisms edit their own genomes.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Engineered transcription-associated Cas9 targeting in eukaryotic cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Engineered transcription-associated Cas9 targeting in eukaryotic cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Synthetic yeast chromosome XI design provides a testbed for the study of extrachromosomal circular DNA dynamics.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Context-dependent neocentromere activity in synthetic yeast chromosomeCell genomics · 2023Article
- Practical Approaches for the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Widespread epistasis among beneficial genetic variants revealed by high-throughput genome editing.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Synthetic regulatory genomics uncovers enhancer context dependence at the Sox2 locus.Molecular cell · 2023Article
- Efficient breeding of industrial brewing yeast strains using CRISPR/Cas9-aided mating-type switching.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Modeling DNA trapping of anticancer therapeutic targets using missense mutations identifies dominant synthetic lethal interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Lager Yeast Design Through Meiotic Segregation of aFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021Article
- Endogenous 2μ Plasmid Editing for Pathway Engineering inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Different transcriptional responses of haploid and diploid S. cerevisiae strains to changes in cofactor preference of XR.Microbial cell factories · 2020Article
- Crossbreeding of Yeasts Domesticated for Fermentation: Infertility Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- A single Ho-induced double-strand break at the MAT locus is lethal in Candida glabrata.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Synthetic hybrids of six yeast species.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and highly efficient mating-type switching of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.