Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150307›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2018

Approaching Retention within the ABCD Study.

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Linda Chang, Linda B Cottler, Susan F Tapert, Gayathri J Dowling, Sandra A Brown

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mental health trajectory groups: Family income, neighborhood disadvantage, and role of the school environment.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Better Design, Better Engagement, Better Data: Adolescents' Insights for Improving Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah W Feldstein EwingOregon Health & Science University, Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, M/C DC7P, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Electronic address: feldstei@ohsu.edu.
Linda ChangUniversity of Maryland, School of Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 419 W. Redwood Street, Suite 225, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: linda.chang@umm.edu.
Linda B CottlerUniversity of Florida, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Rd, PO Box 100231, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: lbcottler@ufl.edu.
Susan F TapertUniversity of California, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive (MC 0043), La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0812, USA. Electronic address: stapert@ucsd.edu.
Gayathri J DowlingNational Institute on Drug Abuse, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, USA. Electronic address: dowlingg@nida.nih.gov.
Sandra A BrownUniversity of California, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive (MC 0043), La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0812, USA. Electronic address: sandrabrown@ucsd.edu.

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5M
Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041148 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Damien A Fair, Rebekah S Huber · 2015 to 2026
$22.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041089NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041148NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041123NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention efforts are critical to maintain relationships with research participants over time. This is especially important for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, where families are asked to stay engaged with the study throughout the course of 10 years. This high-degree of involvement is essential to longitudinally track child and adolescent development. At a minimum, we will connect with families every 6 months by telephone, and every year in person, with closer contact with the youth directly as they transition into adolescence. Differential retention, when related to non-random issues pertaining to demographic or risk features, can negatively impact the generalizability of study outcomes. Thus, to ensure high rates of retention for all participants, the ABCD study employs a number of efforts to support youth and families. This overview details the framework and concrete steps for retention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentBrainChildCognitionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetention, PsychologyRisk FactorsABCD studyAdolescentsLongitudinalMulti-siteRetention

Identifiers

PMID29150307
PMCPMC6333413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.