Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29150011›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2017

Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for loss-of-function in the early chick embryo.

Shashank Gandhi, Michael L Piacentino, Felipe M Vieceli, Marianne E Bronner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A low-level Cdkn1c/p57EMBO reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CRISPR/Cas9-TargetedJournal of developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  19. In Ovo Gain- and Loss-of-Function Approaches to Study Gut Morphogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shashank GandhiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Michael L PiacentinoDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Felipe M VieceliDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Marianne E BronnerDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States. Electronic address: mbronner@caltech.edu.

Funding

Transcriptional Casualty in Embryonic Morphogenesis: from the Specifications GRNP01HD037105 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DAVIDSON, ERIC H · 1999 to 2018
$27.1M
Gene Regulatory Network Controlling Premigratory Cranial vs Trunk Neural CrestR01DE024157 · NIDCR · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRONNER, MARIANNE · 2014 to 2025
$4.0M
Clonal analysis of the cranial neural crestR01DE027568 · NIDCR · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRONNER, MARIANNE · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Determining the position and role of MafB and Krox20 in the cardiac neural crest cell gene regulatory programF32HD088022 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PIACENTINO, MICHAEL LOUIS · 2016 to 2018
$170k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD088022NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD037105NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024157NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 has made genome editing possible in virtually any organism, including those not previously amenable to genetic manipulations. Here, we present an optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 for application to early avian embryos with improved efficiency via a three-fold strategy. First, we employed Cas9 protein flanked with two nuclear localization signal sequences for improved nuclear localization. Second, we used a modified guide RNA (gRNA) scaffold that obviates premature termination of transcription and unstable Cas9-gRNA interactions. Third, we used a chick-specific U6 promoter that yields 4-fold higher gRNA expression than the previously utilized human U6. For rapid screening of gRNAs for in vivo applications, we also generated a chicken fibroblast cell line that constitutively expresses Cas9. As proof of principle, we performed electroporation-based loss-of-function studies in the early chick embryo to knock out Pax7 and Sox10, key transcription factors with known functions in neural crest development. The results show that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion causes loss of their respective proteins and transcripts, as well as predicted downstream targets. Taken together, the results reveal the utility of this optimized CRISPR/Cas9 method for targeted gene knockout in chicken embryos in a manner that is reproducible, robust and specific.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsBacterial ProteinsChick EmbryoCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesGenomeNeural CrestRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsChick embryosCRISPR/Cas9gRNAKnockoutNeural crest

Identifiers

PMID29150011
PMCPMC5728388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.