Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29149903›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Improving access to school health services as perceived by school professionals.

Janine Bezem, Debbie Heinen, Ria Reis, Simone E Buitendijk, Mattijs E Numans, Paul L Kocken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Janine BezemDepartment of Preventive Youth Health Care, Municipal Health Service Gelderland-Midden, P.O. Box 5364, 6802, EJ, Arnhem, The Netherlands. janine.bezem@vggm.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-6547
Debbie HeinenDepartment of Preventive Youth Health Care, Municipal Health Service Gelderland-Midden, P.O. Box 5364, 6802, EJ, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Ria ReisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Simone E BuitendijkEducation Office, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom.
Mattijs E NumansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul L KockenDepartment of Child Health, TNO, P.O. Box 3005, 2301, DA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLImperial College London · GBVeiligheids- en Gezondheidsregio Gelderland-Midden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe organisation of health assessments by preventive health services focusing on children's health and educational performance needs to be improved due to evolving health priorities such as mental health problems, reduced budgets and shortages of physicians and nurses. We studied the impact on the school professionals' perception of access to school health services (SHS) when a triage approach was used for population-based health assessments in primary schools. The triage approach involves pre-assessments by SHS assistants, with only those children in need of follow-up being assessed by a physician or nurse. The triage approach was compared with the usual approach in which all children are assessed by physicians and nurses.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study, comparing school professionals' perceptions of the triage and the usual approach to SHS. The randomly selected school professionals completed digital questionnaires about contact frequency, the approachability of SHS and the appropriateness of support from SHS. School care coordinators and teachers were invited to participate in the study, resulting in a response of 444 (35.7%) professionals from schools working with the triage approach and 320 (44.6%) professionals working with the usual approach.

resultsRespondents from schools using the triage approach had more contacts with SHS and were more satisfied with the appropriateness of support from SHS than respondents in the approach-as-usual group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the perceived approachability of SHS.

conclusionsSchool professionals were more positive about access to SHS when a triage approach to routine assessments was in place than when the usual approach was used. Countries with similar population-based SHS systems could benefit from a triage approach which gives physicians and nurses more opportunities to attend schools for consultations and assessments of children on demand.

Indexed as

SchoolsTriageChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PrioritiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePreventive Health ServicesReferral and ConsultationSchool Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesAccessibilityHealth assessmentsPreventive child health careSchool health servicesSpecific needsTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID29149903
PMCPMC5693589
OpenAlexW2768626553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.